Re: [edu-team] Guides program website for IETF 104

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 05 March 2019 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FDD1312CF for <edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 07:24:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iQf1rjiLVNAx for <edu-team@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 07:24:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1041311C2 for <edu-team@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 07:24:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.39.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x25FOTBw002199 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Mar 2019 09:24:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1551799472; bh=/RD2mf5Ui3XRxeFkQKRNUEUjg6jS7+ZjHa7JVbeg0hI=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=pYbodVlBzB+agfO02rE3O/P6mQQFivVi53b3+o7u+FgJKhvCJh81A9eAqp8DqZzp2 dJp8Us+F+hV7YrtDQDnS8IoiTosCB17WBfqdaD81hfF1fiGEr5rXedX1j1lRhYEjQW 98i+kcNW7vfLQvE08k5z6vG7sSsJYVwRynyuYFA0=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.39.7] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Cc: "edu-team@ietf.org" <edu-team@ietf.org>
References: <7b8d6808-fcb6-2d3f-d74d-fe4e02febec0@nostrum.com> <1F688327-6B99-4228-8C9D-048F22848C21@isoc.org> <yblsgw1nb4b.fsf@wu.hardakers.net>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <a37f1c49-e447-c11c-e4ca-5825d1b3ddc1@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 09:24:29 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <yblsgw1nb4b.fsf@wu.hardakers.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/edu-team/c2MtifvCgZxInxh5jUkGKfYJICY>
Subject: Re: [edu-team] Guides program website for IETF 104
X-BeenThere: edu-team@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Education Team <edu-team.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/edu-team>, <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/edu-team/>
List-Post: <mailto:edu-team@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/edu-team>, <mailto:edu-team-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 15:24:45 -0000

It is currently sending through a box that hasn't had it's mail 
reputation cleaned.

I will shift it to send through a local one that has many years of 
(good) reputation. If that is somehow still problematic, I'll talk to 
glen about relaying through the primary ietf server.

RjS

On 3/4/19 11:28 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> writes:
>
>> I used a second email address to volunteer to be a guide, but I
>> haven’t yet gotten a link yet via email to finish the “volunteering”…
>> I did it twice to make sure I wasn’t mistaken…
> Hmm...  the bounce message seems to indicate that the mail is being
> denied by microsoft (which I guess is handling isoc's mail).  Robert, is
> this being sent through a brand new SMTP server?  IE, directly from the
> box?  Maybe we should configure it to transport through the well-known
> IETF server instead?
>
>     ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
> <odonoghue@isoc.org>
>      (reason: 550 5.7.606 Access denied, banned sending IP [138.197.218.117]. To request removal from this list pl...crosoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=526655 (AS16012609) [BN3NAM04FT025.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com])
>
>     ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> ... while talking to isoc-org.mail.protection.outlook.com.:
>>>> DATA
> <<< 550 5.7.606 Access denied, banned sending IP [138.197.218.117]. To request removal from this list please visit https://sender.office.com/ and follow the directions. For more information please go to  http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=526655 (AS16012609) [BN3NAM04FT025.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com]
> 550 5.1.1 <odonoghue@isoc.org>... User unknown
> <<< 503 5.5.2 Need rcpt command [BN3NAM04FT025.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com]
>
>