IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Efficientnd-dt] Food for thought - router-controlled RS refresh

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> Thu, 21 August 2014 07:34 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@acm.org>
X-Original-To: efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49AE1A00D8 for <efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.465
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XUkLt2RAlqF4 for <efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d.mail.sonic.net (d.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE001A0424 for <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (70-36-182-172.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [70.36.182.172]) (authenticated bits=0) by d.mail.sonic.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7L7YEAM032461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:34:15 -0700
Message-ID: <53F5A0F6.5060909@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:34:14 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "efficientnd-dt@ietf.org" <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090903010202000500010007"
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVbqEjNt/oaUlG5oN/GltXuZgVrbmA+DJHfz0hRZHKKdDiE/MhEGcXp1JQuHyRUQgRdz3wkb2LyKfEeLp9TzdCjC
X-Sonic-ID: C;EncbjQUp5BGT0wvd54E5FQ== M;nrNXjQUp5BGT0wvd54E5FQ==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/efficientnd-dt/R5RdardJWxGmGlIkj4vB5iZBpmg
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:04:05 -0700
Subject: [Efficientnd-dt] Food for thought - router-controlled RS refresh
X-BeenThere: efficientnd-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: 6man Efficient ND Design Team discussion list <efficientnd-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/efficientnd-dt>, <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/efficientnd-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt>, <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:34:20 -0000

I mentioned this in our Friday meeting in Toronto - finally put it on paper.

Do folks think this is a reasonable starting point for some Design Team 
output when it comes to RS/RA?
If so, should we include all the RS/RA pieces in one document? 
(implementation advise, raise the max advinterval, etc)

    Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email