IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Efficientnd-dt] Food for thought - router-controlled RS refresh

Erik Kline <ek@google.com> Mon, 25 August 2014 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB1A1A8AAB for <efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.046
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.046 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ti16N4SpRPzq for <efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x229.google.com (mail-qg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9FF91A8AAC for <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id z107so9345731qgd.14 for <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=4EsjCxnO1Xk5t3IEGuJy7W9UhZZtzNftBwPmUByOWQQ=; b=GeY2+aDPC7/zvu1UXV0gTDVUe25f0wm2ihoBWRee2xzLiQG/ZZ3u1bC+s0V2VUNjQs H+oVU3Nrqz/Ao8HB7ScVVyUyPI7greYSQkvp/KMUL6sPw4ua5Mq6PDHWSq98x49DDdhI jdXQM7vz5yCdW33iLPn/tRyc0eudLx2zn3gLVjUjj8rLWEn2kB34eKVYg7apqUgsnpOs B/CRLPkC8itLazxl3KP0SIaCR1UzGgLYdinOgADCgwJtYbyEMDC4om+Vc1p2ZutMrSg3 NMjSOXJ6+ezA2B+1bpIkLTWEPmVuos/I1jZ41q9UDziAMEgOZNj5ZWStsKebjp29hTrk jOsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=4EsjCxnO1Xk5t3IEGuJy7W9UhZZtzNftBwPmUByOWQQ=; b=eqF3i8tv+dyO3onXhrBKMGQeiLGn+JI525V16wNSjWdlE2KIccnPKQ3f6yZBCJ96w8 JKg6lK4XlcuEoFUdcIXdbEe4unOxNuTXXn5w8e4urfb+Mtz4aW5UltODjCpLhJYpuagF QZFA/suL/egmrET+zC0HJUyygIbg/a/+hunMY72K6xWszdOLHrxeq9L7zuIO/eQSfwT8 lOeEnmm4aw1S8SHu0HZCc6L37xeaeA9qU/57bFBqqgXFhN//ZfCLeSNJXa4j+5dARPp2 62j2TOwDr8vXY/rWum/i0XnZ3P6vvP9ftk+iLcxYCl2+H75hrw1gOADxWnDWiFACPc8t zy8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlOkwswkRsqYtPitWxHFWArd4QNfji9WuAP9s8f5EABBQBxoLkUTDpBWytSDSYoVFd2KNbo
X-Received: by 10.140.97.131 with SMTP id m3mr29592570qge.80.1408949530841; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.23.200 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 23:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53F5A14F.70501@sonic.net>
References: <53F5A0F6.5060909@acm.org> <53F5A14F.70501@sonic.net>
From: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:51:50 +0900
Message-ID: <CAAedzxqwuiPQ6=oimgkGPfq0rtHuTo=Z5Ph=a+a22ei606ft4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a99064afc8505016ea0c6"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/efficientnd-dt/p1uks95h8AFbdXpTWGy021ihlPQ
Cc: "efficientnd-dt@ietf.org" <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Efficientnd-dt] Food for thought - router-controlled RS refresh
X-BeenThere: efficientnd-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: 6man Efficient ND Design Team discussion list <efficientnd-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/efficientnd-dt>, <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/efficientnd-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt>, <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:52:12 -0000

Thanks for writing this up.

A question: is it a problem if we make resilient-rs a MUST for rs-refresh
implementations?
​

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email