IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Efficientnd-dt] ND related test results draft

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net> Fri, 13 March 2015 03:27 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@sonic.net>
X-Original-To: efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100DE1A89EF for <efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kinvnDh0pAK for <efficientnd-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c.mail.sonic.net (c.mail.sonic.net [64.142.111.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA1F1A87AE for <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.22.239.87] ([162.210.130.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by c.mail.sonic.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t2D3Qos7001497 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:26:50 -0700
Message-ID: <550258FA.2090702@sonic.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:26:50 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@sonic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samita Chakrabarti <samita.chakrabarti@ericsson.com>, "Erik Nordmark (nordmark@acm.org)" <nordmark@acm.org>
References: <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F01C2E84C1@eusaamb103.ericsson.se> <5502036C.2000105@sonic.net> <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F01C2EAE8E@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <ECA43DA70480A3498E43C3471FB2E1F01C2EAE8E@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sonic-CAuth: UmFuZG9tSVZG67mTvjgduccd3JwuIzHtYFPb0EjrHi5P77PK1UQQIC4UPzmnPzOvlcqGpD76uzwveUor1RwGw/zMyiF0IBQx
X-Sonic-ID: C;IMStyTDJ5BGYo+8Jj30JFw== M;MkvJyTDJ5BGYo+8Jj30JFw==
X-Sonic-Spam-Details: 0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/efficientnd-dt/lKNUS_zCau3dx8i6qoFEczko4oE>
Cc: "asood2@ncsu.edu" <asood2@ncsu.edu>, "efficientnd-dt@ietf.org" <efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Efficientnd-dt] ND related test results draft
X-BeenThere: efficientnd-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: 6man Efficient ND Design Team discussion list <efficientnd-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/efficientnd-dt>, <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/efficientnd-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:efficientnd-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/efficientnd-dt>, <mailto:efficientnd-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 03:27:00 -0000

On 3/12/15 5:24 PM, Samita Chakrabarti wrote:
> Also one observation was made (not listed in the draft) that  over several hours of duration only 2/% - 3% battery was consumed when the phone is left idle and periodic RA messages were sent. But the accuracy of the experiment was not clear. Perhaps it is because the phone sleeps and they don't listen to any of the multicast ND messages.
One could design tests to check if the phone receives and processes the 
RA. Just have the router send a single RA with a new prefix and with a 
long prefix lifetime. Later one can check for the existence of that 
prefix on the phone.

   Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email