IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Eligibility-discuss] Re: [Gendispatch] Re: Re: Re : Comments on Composition and Comportment of the IETF Nominatin g Committee draft

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 21 August 2026 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A280F12D73A21 for <eligibility-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1787333045; bh=12iTICEh3p95fSM4SBF7M/8b14bK8XDCQWUsRqMUieY=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=qbxYMtEv7LNcLvhrV7grRSGCGx6ZatGOyJbhHnh2LUwdp9agOWWe24RHeKGNHFuZU pM3DECOWvNRUj54guMu0SPOilfdGJSypVFjZG3BxbPKTxMGBm9zxjXmu3u6MCmlGmq OYhNBDYQ+gtybXUEyYIwpNh6djv46iMgQ8VX+sSg=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue.com header.b="nhLjNiR/"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="CAOOG40+"
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c3NLnGLom7NS for <eligibility-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01BFC12D73A15 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEC2140021B; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:24:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:24:04 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1787333044; x=1787419444; bh=HZUzwOu9sB V5Nvl3Utc4AYr97TmUAX5jhMK3WDRx/4c=; b=nhLjNiR/MSWyBYYxe1xSiuQ95k ZbKmPCa9+rtSDFGFqMR13IMNbhxVNvfUOQME+zHad0n5rfwTmL9wP9g6SO7S0UhX 5oBtfIAGAjkCBJXHOrIH5JftFrSW40bDrdZCaydb0ZNOOXJ/CXtGotEvpiegttiD cXuRpWxHebPFoLfk4jo5tYc9BS1dVki7/Eu0SNDO1z4YD4riLMw7LxQYYSxP9cpT zD1WpATbhiOcBQlqjvbVOk8jnqlM1gU9OlpBW+PmPTGW4y1erxRd+Wo55E34YgN8 coD2Hh3UzZD5Wp/N5r5RXtXS9Wxqc0apJos9Gi/nQ4Mzx3Rse1NWPGdHAoHg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1787333044; x=1787419444; bh=HZUzwOu9sBV5Nvl3Utc4AYr97TmUAX5jhMK 3WDRx/4c=; b=CAOOG40+G6OJwaQKs6ztLOzwNcJnBNgr2FoSRE/Mrg88lIsnr2L y/0GUXYFfAOFaoG31w0OmZU1LmbvLsAd5KcnlTjrv3pqu9W5iTo4gls/Pm0nZ9+A acmfHd+ZeL6nut+qlkWU8n5gYJlwmB2nvXPtNMqtyNmd9yHbpE7kefV4DnA8ieY4 5r8e7r0hjDmAYUCUeKhoPoDSLVZxUNsuEfiWEyYcgHZhhK9zzvALVG+HHj3Nm8gc gvysbMDaR9qaKSGzYljwydBlJAgFE92sNUAhXiYp65hARawtAwVO3b2O0m0fJWHR 3kxtGOnH1snKlc7h20yNzadw+4JpGd+3okA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:tImIarOmQYkuUXkQtkB6cq5yMpei1C2KfJzCv45V_wgBX8m3Xzf6Qg> <xme:tImIatbDjgXS3dz_P5IJO9pEHPDSGJjR4xBICQ_iqI7_4ntm5cy2sFgDAmbO11x8t wi01-9xeA7oHo4K-89nC1Xi0hH1yoYgNIjB6030Odbt1HMMvuLb6lQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:tImIanqugfM7O2sDH34319JSl3S3V3mTZotXAhTVAKa9fijqz_snzJgiXOQmHTqsvsFooQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTFWT8PS+FJW3tmadv22lqERk/53KNi1we6+pzO5nwn3vIMxDN15YCbHkKUG0nGaLz OIJcrTa0A9s/RIY95jH/B1oWqgRRJ1vFGybq3ebjKjWY8Fz89c7NHj6oADVETVFz52me0+ 1fLT/LN3gYyZFlYpIQ9hkNwl8VJYoCEPxUhFtM5ASsL5lBRuoGFRJdmPdshl/bjsC2vpVi DKPhqPunAsqnfK/yRAvOqLU9P5WJFGiBm0AaulChqfjkGowNI9d66SkJCloitT8CyWqbut UEzsFyyNl/NnGzP7XlKla1XFRUKUBxRD3Ic+J9ilR8/d4E/aBltFl3BcNRS3oa7AmbNia8 UEE9YX/ZDQ85TOTUOJ00ZbIudmYHZAPsPJRRDkoB0VCuX77CfdWBSotnyF7zG7R/WrkymN wxYJI/s7uQgszQ91swjZLX6Slsm+ayPF6GABMaT7IhI2kuKG7BWiIJbV6+owktj7zZovqm yqDmk0U94BKQcxyogkRnhxrhoSBwJzhHiRcPCNfebPsFb4qBnTwAZoYaj2jZAWzVb/aknV a1ssscWDGZAFXAZgR9LwaIRVZvCL/veAiyASHA+ptVkWp+4LcrT7hxw26dFrK02WyZpf88 9B92cRqEMgHm9dc907OpPZh3F4MV+o35i0UBIhkZY8sz81rdCwrAtlOigGmg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:tImIapZpO77rqxOIhi7j7Ifh7CuWztPhUbyEKSWrpfWZpWtSc4S0Vw> <xmx:tImIanQ00jRJfWQw-pqiHMdOTDaysGFibn83m9lhcTWMIHtMvbSNBQ> <xmx:tImIao4OIlY1Q1p797B83s2486sLV-jTv2bQbCCSx5bjgPWclN7RUw> <xmx:tImIakzQTkLj2jDmZnarCWm9N5LHHa4pgurv7GhLXx19qYf-ARg8dw> <xmx:tImIahBFAgLJSIcP1gmhe_3e63z317-lYPZ7sjo8Ov6vdhqzrb3oc-7C>
Feedback-ID: i1136489e:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 21 Aug 2026 13:24:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <4B3D4007-6399-4833-94F9-50644AC897B5@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_98C0465A-3B42-474C-A14D-450A19C0A4B1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3901.200.8\))
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:23:52 -0700
In-Reply-To: <27f19440-91b7-4e1e-ac16-d3241f0f327c@huitema.net>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20260706031812.0b0262a8@elandnews.com> <d66e9d26-48e4-4f11-a146-2bd7b89adb28@joelhalpern.com> <MN2PR17MB4031443262CFA19D4174130DCDA72@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> <ead772a9-0bf2-4adf-93ae-5103e272b465@joelhalpern.com> <0228ce06-661a-4781-b39a-5f74afb6d8dc@huitema.net> <CANeU+ZAjFwmWzX62jtmg6mR3W89SApiFCo2xngN+2DPBu-Zsrw@mail.gmail.com> <515245cb-049c-415c-9a0c-6e9dba4a4408@tarakiyee.com> <C5A861B6-50EA-4BEE-A66E-8C37FEC5CC6A@vigilsec.com> <f23be10d-a9ac-41a3-b6bc-ab9b05deba5b@nthpermutation.com> <7EBE0386-C55C-449C-AF3B-0496122D392E@fugue.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20260819143446.158ef9c0@elandnews.com> <0893F83F-C107-45FB-B58E-B11D64F08ABE@fugue.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20260819161934.0987d238@elandnews.com> <E5A037A7-5DD2-4012-8BDB-2C9D9E00607B@fugue.com> <8091cae7-be44-4935-9548-16a37d593b78@joelhalpern.com> <DM4PR11MB5469BB3EFD7DCB1C30BC65A5B5A32@DM4PR11MB5469.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <E9C15B58-DE99-46F0-BD81-817D9DB4035D@fugue.com> <27f19440-91b7-4e1e-ac16-d3241f0f327c@huitema.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3901.200.8)
Message-ID-Hash: AFOJPQZDWGZPETQFYWDOPAL4TKVPFS5B
X-Message-ID-Hash: AFOJPQZDWGZPETQFYWDOPAL4TKVPFS5B
X-MailFrom: mellon@fugue.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "eligibility-discuss@ietf.org" <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Eligibility-discuss] Re: [Gendispatch] Re: Re: Re : Comments on Composition and Comportment of the IETF Nominatin g Committee draft
List-Id: IETF eligibility procedures <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/_tXdxzOGRQEimGQMWzTxwBVnu_w>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-leave@ietf.org>

On Aug 21, 2026, at 09:30, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote:
> That's an argument that I have heard in a variety of HR trainings over time, but I always found it contrived. 

It's an argument that's so strongly supported by research that even the U.S. SEC has a test for it (soon to be deleted I'm sure), and various EU governments _require_ it. Why do you know better than the SEC, the various EU governments, etc? It's fine to have an opinion on this, but is your opinion based on anything besides your personal experience and the conjectures you've shared with us here? If not, I would really encourage you to do some reading on the topic.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status