IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Emailcore] Received: header

Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> Tue, 19 January 2021 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <jgh@wizmail.org>
X-Original-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6353A1672 for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:44:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=wizmail.org header.b=CoaNuRWR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wizmail.org header.b=h7UH75Ba
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nPrWviMSkVoJ for <emailcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:44:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wizmail.org (wizmail.org [IPv6:2a00:1940:107::2:0:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59FBD3A1671 for <emailcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:44:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wizmail.org; s=e202001; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:References:To:From: Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive:Autocrypt; bh=IOWw2B0Kio2Vm6v3ndUUKszHk9nTD8U2PHBG7iLaw1E=; b=CoaNuRWRfcFzMfGm7jMIu7klhv XxcdwFQTc3Y2DMLQMvkLHWmuHKxRGdNNVcDAkV+nydA912d2RmuQYjSa5pCw==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wizmail.org ; s=r202001; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:References:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post: List-Owner:List-Archive:Autocrypt; bh=IOWw2B0Kio2Vm6v3ndUUKszHk9nTD8U2PHBG7iLaw1E=; b=h7UH75BanYBeJffgC5KiNFOYOd v5ep5OJ8mEJhiLdp9nayCUe3BHXwOjfoHvLtO+6eBzxtrq0B32vhlOQ+3JxLWs1L/vRPvzsS0PnVZ 7N4FRCUQCfttsCohy/xd8Hl3l6737MSdOl6+5R3u+951igbl91w8L+Jk5BM03MfGIATfVjl/81asj 5bmCspeYg5c/3vNPsYKezSZMo5A7p4gS1+ONldtoX5qRoP8vLXeIDVU9k9e2FhDtvzxsTm0AEUXL6 jFcIbZu2x/E+0wa1Ep+to5gCrmpAi9ZRuV1C7XjVZfj8H0cmH6L1GpXo6BC5gELrPbatRLCRke7xs s3PxRkLQ==;
Authentication-Results: wizmail.org; iprev=pass (vgate18.wizint.net) smtp.remote-ip=2a00:1940:107::1:2f:0; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=jgh@wizmail.org
Received: from vgate18.wizint.net ([2a00:1940:107::1:2f:0] helo=lap.dom.ain) by wizmail.org (Exim 4.94.111) (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 with esmtpsa id 1l1v3J-003yku-09 for emailcore@ietf.org (return-path <jgh@wizmail.org>); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:44:25 +0000
To: emailcore@ietf.org
References: <e40a609b-6df6-0e35-eedd-72d2c98fb02b@isode.com> <ca91fc48-3779-c215-de21-dcbe0cad4f3f@tana.it>
From: Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org>
Message-ID: <0ca0c0c6-632d-62bb-ed98-361ae4424fa7@wizmail.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:44:22 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ca91fc48-3779-c215-de21-dcbe0cad4f3f@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Pcms-Received-Sender: vgate18.wizint.net ([2a00:1940:107::1:2f:0] helo=lap.dom.ain) with esmtpsa
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emailcore/uZvKpI89Ljw1NRGfgBnF-NLDSPQ>
Subject: [Emailcore] Received: header
X-BeenThere: emailcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EMAILCORE proposed working group list <emailcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emailcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:emailcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emailcore>, <mailto:emailcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:44:33 -0000

On 19/01/2021 17:07, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> Anyway, this Section deserves a comefrom Section 4.4.  That is, for example:
> 
>     For            = CFWS "FOR" FWS ( Path / Mailbox )
>                    ; Not if multiple recipients, see Section 7.2

Diverging topic, sorry.  Is it strictly needed to shout "FOR" here?

I notice that Exim currently, in its default, uses lower-case "for";
and similar "by", "id" and "with".  This code dates from 1996.
-- 
Cheers,
   Jeremy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email