Re: [eman] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <> Fri, 24 April 2015 01:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9A91B348A; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kWjzjxh5Mhji; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC871B2CF7; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=7412; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429839924; x=1431049524; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=RnG0pz7QWtRSBWTAlDoGV3HFSJ2KEjC98J6ti9FgGCc=; b=EJ8MOIQ/NhCvjxhrCpHw2KyYd30O+36VRwTW/qZQ9K/Pvx58XF42zCpj MtulHo8KKWEVXGAaNE68iZr+ennY8yv/7S+iieIUvPa3bCdSXRyWDVBdK rRHPFPdb/TbQxnwF9VgKlGeHgSQPT6fCfV+iok1VqsAGzTpO5+W9BqyL5 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,636,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="414352904"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2015 01:45:23 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3O1jNfG008774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:45:23 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:45:23 -0500
From: "Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <>
To: Brian Haberman <>, The IESG <>
Thread-Topic: [eman] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQfbmq/GXtWlDjfEGVomBJRiui8Z1bQ6uA
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:45:23 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D15EEB5740C72moulchanciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [eman] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 01:45:57 -0000

Hi  Brian,

Some of the specific use cases, you are referring had been provided as feedback to WG (email or meetings)  when the draft was draft was presented.
It was felt that it would be useful  "unique, non-overlapping" set of use cases (scenarios) of interest to energy management.
It may be that after the other MIB drafts have evolved over the years, it may be that we solve only a subset of use cases.


From: Brian Haberman <<>>
Date: Thursday, 23 April 2015 4:35 AM
To: The IESG <<>>
Cc: "<>" <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Subject: [eman] Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-10: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


The draft still calls out some use cases that appear out of scope,
especially after the discussion around the EMAN MIB document. This
DISCUSS is a placeholder to address one of the author's suggestion to
delete: 1) the use cases in section 2.7 last paragraph (net-zero
building), 2) 2.12 (off-grid devices), and 3) 2.14 (power capping).


Thank you for addressing the issue of the document's status.

eman mailing list<>