IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Emu] Adoption call for EAP-DPP

Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> Tue, 16 August 2022 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@akayla.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F3BC1524CF for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PYRgVJ8JogCi for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D8C2C1522AD for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F81C12F57A for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:12:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from spectre (server.houseofyee.com [173.8.184.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CBDA12FA2B for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 16:12:22 -0400 (EDT)
From: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
To: emu@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:12:25 -0700
Message-ID: <01bf01d8b1ac$81233890$8369a9b0$@akayla.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: Adixq7pkJdFRLrLgSkaBpKAfkzw9jQ==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.09 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/94sNeAkv7VTfi40lNLbmfFYZXYE>
Subject: [Emu] Adoption call for EAP-DPP
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 20:12:24 -0000

This is an adoption call for EAP-DPP (draft-friel-tls-eap-dpp-05)[1]. This
document aligns with the charter item to "Define mechanisms by which EAP
methods can support creation of long-term credentials for the peer based on
initial limited-use credentials." The latest revision incorporates feedback
from both the TLS and EMU working groups. Please review and respond to the
list if you think this document is or is not an appropriate working group
item for EMU by September 1, 2022.

Thanks,

Peter and Joe

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-friel-tls-eap-dpp/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email