IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] [lamps] EAP/EMU recommendations for client cert validation logic

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sat, 18 January 2020 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4124A120074; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 11:56:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lgzwVoBqdIgT; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 11:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5E28120019; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 11:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122332.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 00IJqb84030902; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 19:56:50 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=rIjTEfEVJJr0xRfOnBGMqnberqjxwiR7Zl9yAxP1PW8=; b=nNlFk7TmxV/Ee4t8cRCX8s2IOyhktcbChK4gSRyo0gwBlxw5oGBang6V9hhdJePbPV3D hJc3xUym/Aom0I7y6ypFyjH21jGsImIRrT1ZP9lqVptR/UVQH1Ycq1X7P6YBfluMO815 G4bIYWKARbIwYCxfb87/rVWfFj8iafkvVS6So1/ggA4Jk9gpvVVJMf8nH6uFH7XfI786 ueMQmgcxLM8Qq5ghLFhNQh4GBFY5lfQAKmmYJSarI+TgA7C6D22MD0GFPKCx1hmU509B 3L7GsAZuTWXPoy1BrXK23q5wD4HGWQrwOKaAk0e/dMv7bpJKdonBs/0Y9ucTTCdet/E1 7A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2xkyjqh4q6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 19:56:50 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 00IJmMuR030014; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 11:56:49 -0800
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.57]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2xm0vbg7r3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 18 Jan 2020 11:56:49 -0800
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 14:56:48 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Sat, 18 Jan 2020 14:56:48 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
CC: EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>, "spasm@ietf.org" <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] [Emu] EAP/EMU recommendations for client cert validation logic
Thread-Index: AQHVxXm0e7J5rDEf+EOqsfcXsBtB+affyfIAgAAFKwCAABiWAIAAEKMAgAAU+ICAAEpjAIAAZ4qAgABUywCAAHFCAIAADVQAgAtuGYCAAA0IgIACc58AgAAjHoCAAKZdgIAAHagAgABgMYCAAA4UAIAADUwAgAAYVYCAADYNAP//tW+A
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 19:56:47 +0000
Message-ID: <B8C490B7-39F3-4EAC-B04D-9471B04AE3BB@akamai.com>
References: <B2989B0E-8B6B-4B7A-B871-AF520310B3FC@deployingradius.com> <CAErg=HG06ZpiRUYogiVwoJPsZDsjzAVvO0B4=K=PE7aAHe44rA@mail.gmail.com> <6CEB4C89-B749-4A65-A25A-A12830ED8A62@deployingradius.com> <CAErg=HFPCYKgUEXHaOC0sQECYaVmt0TZXe-uDrKzFiNSAcdckg@mail.gmail.com> <00453E78-D991-4B4D-A138-5788FACC47C2@deployingradius.com> <CAErg=HFYQpfqTE9==TzGo795ZiuNBGVMqWuXS6GJ2DV0nGxPzA@mail.gmail.com> <316CC74D-667B-4A1E-AD48-A702DF705423@deployingradius.com> <6191.1578513600@localhost> <CB67C090-4D6A-4586-AD7C-99A29EF5D92D@deployingradius.com> <CAOgPGoDADPY125Bf7mbPCpEVkwVF=YmbG9wAN0S-WyCWg27BCw@mail.gmail.com> <20200116040715.GC80030@kduck.mit.edu> <CAErg=HHwLOw9sL2=nGca5MuuyiV2Zghrp6prR7SqLJAvfCLmjA@mail.gmail.com> <B3A03277-C176-4E63-ADB3-70133E2ABA46@deployingradius.com> <MN2PR11MB3901D1B17802F2DACCC8966CDB300@MN2PR11MB3901.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAErg=HE0XDbhuibtky5VhvZYUnQxDitLSEuf4uzXnuByNQN+4Q@mail.gmail.com> <55CE7F32-B5DE-44F5-AE06-72BE12FA05FF@deployingradius.com> <CAErg=HH8LjqMR37Ek1uK12uCDj4N89Ot=Fm_PLOBdeXsv3sdpw@mail.gmail.com> <7F591857-4B7B-41BD-B101-6C40BE527644@deployingradius.com> <CAErg=HF9SQCmP9hi8SP-EstyYL-qVLWMeitP2AHc3T6ZWZM4vQ@mail.gmail.com> <9AADAAD6-0A66-4198-AFBF-DBC2D87DBFA0@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <9AADAAD6-0A66-4198-AFBF-DBC2D87DBFA0@deployingradius.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.21.0.200113
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.112.80]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C54B8143016B1E4B9889F7F731CC4EDD@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-01-18_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-2001180164
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-18_07:2020-01-16, 2020-01-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=996 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1011 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001180164
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/9UA_7yrf62Re9T8le5QoXCDE3g4>
Subject: Re: [Emu] [lamps] EAP/EMU recommendations for client cert validation logic
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 19:56:52 -0000

> There’s no set of entities blessed in some special power which only they can mint certificates

Thank you for injecting some much-needed humor into this thread.  That's the funniest f---ing thing I've read from you in a long time.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email