IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] Adoption call for eap.arpa

Alexander Clouter <alex+ietf@coremem.com> Tue, 12 March 2024 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <alex+ietf@coremem.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78183C151098 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 05:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=coremem.com header.b="sAc73Sr/"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="DB05lz+g"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ykiDzshQ1Wt5 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 05:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.156]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A19AC15108E for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 05:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34947114008A for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:46:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap46 ([10.202.2.96]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:46:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=coremem.com; h= cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1710247583; x=1710333983; bh=W25+UzYxig TA/zQaP5TAuJawlZaeM+jg2xVg3c7Y0f8=; b=sAc73Sr/9i4st+uzHtpArY9zG2 lGoxFLoTD99wfXGs0z/uk9UqgsBqLZ59lguQc1SANTcKKZY5nHahCHbwO0AohfV2 lB/sh2Nls6speol2Yv4P0gca4tAj2c3AuVJE4VzcK2lGSEmbuG3oBfgFgQQWd01B a7vrcoJw6Y6qY/1amQc88Z3KNkk6odZjdZiaUvgEPWM28ilO9I4L0aIUbKCbLZCx PyWEMDeUBKLIiWf3WfzLg/N/MJo40k1UxQzPl7eAKrCXo2VloxuXPm9hlsx5ryBn ZnNvx0gz24+DBs/+f2mYT4vPP4tsOgw1K+H+AGWCZom5lJ1WvEb7Jn+LByNA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1710247583; x=1710333983; bh=W25+UzYxigTA/zQaP5TAuJawlZae M+jg2xVg3c7Y0f8=; b=DB05lz+gqAXKAQj88J4nbBZ2Rk1v7GOvmlPIaZ/AFhSq oTEXVI1HNvwUqglJnW3BwpAu/3erK77PhGr2SCczPAknvpSOihxU2aZfRqafGAid O/YAqUfkFJReK+EVNb83eCQjvzL31KO24Mt7j5WOviuTDOBDGRm9Rmgq9q/mwQA1 dCn/pKQtwQipK1GHe66VkmLylh+eBNnL9K9uQgst4rJNeAoE3cSbBNym8l+vcMlh pspQloeBfSCc9t/Hi5f3yhNBcGlYzQ/uzo0vL1Wz2huset4p7avHq2eXYjetdSUp VHMOWWUYESNGJfi/nIegp149mTtaaHTBKUexeIXUlQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:n07wZam7Nyc60HfF5ug11wYchcZ_UWS1z3YBg_Xz_2RqdtuQU_fRCg> <xme:n07wZR3ZFpsSBsfFB1gw14riQOOpvNdLAEVfYja2HvbESC3zClYPmKHZS6rCWxQU5 h-lpPUZrcsaCy91eA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrjeefgdeggecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdetlhgvgigrnhguvghrucevlhhouhhtvghrfdcuoegrlhgv gidoihgvthhfsegtohhrvghmvghmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvteejhf ehgfegleeuleefteeikefgvefhheekheevvdekueefkeeiieffhfdvgeenucevlhhushht vghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhgvgidoihgvthhfse gtohhrvghmvghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:n07wZYrX5tNK9uKnP9qa9DhEck8dMYmCGy7mEb4NMYL2Wn7o02bb6Q> <xmx:n07wZektC0Natu-DFuJNtr0kFukRKlenirxdfA60LYZI8u9p5DBH3g> <xmx:n07wZY2mETSPrIpN1dVPhEJqTEzCLXUN2FjraSQ_y-IDYVD_Eh0RiQ> <xmx:n07wZVs0CVgDliLYplt30JgdwDSPa52wfau3l7JWtlCBrXTFmD6a4g> <xmx:n07wZV-t-Ar1-pJh6Ch5LcyDOE_hqwGZvSUW8v-o6v0sB7C6tgGBig>
Feedback-ID: ie3614602:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0AFDB2A2008B; Tue, 12 Mar 2024 08:46:23 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-251-g8332da0bf6-fm-20240305.001-g8332da0b
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <2a07a31a-b9ff-4640-a348-cd36b270e63a@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ccaa089f2ee34a5e83fe270d2d6adee0@huawei.com>
References: <F1FD786F-D0B1-494B-B384-95BBB4B7790B@akayla.com> <ccaa089f2ee34a5e83fe270d2d6adee0@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:45:41 +0000
From: Alexander Clouter <alex+ietf@coremem.com>
To: EMU WG <emu@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/OA3yO9sIYTpX37IWt9eeRqgqZuk>
Subject: Re: [Emu] Adoption call for eap.arpa
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:46:29 -0000

On Tue, 12 Mar 2024, at 12:37, Yanlei(Ray) wrote:
> My understanding here is that the EAP server and client will not 
> authenticate each other in EAP-TLS, and all the authentication will be 
> done in the " captive portal ". So why recommend EAP-TLS as a 
> provisioning method? Just send the identifier "portal@eap.arpa" and 
> then jump to a " captive portal ". Is that OK?

So for OOB provisioning (ie. get an IP to access a captive portal) the conversation would be:

>>> EAP-Identity Request
<<< EAP-Identity Response[portal@eap.arpa]
>>> EAP-Success

Sounds sensible.

Cheers

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email