Re: [Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6677 (6802)
Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Tue, 04 January 2022 01:01 UTC
Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794043A133E for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:01:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HmjyoreclQrO for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C6CE3A133D for <emu@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7E8425A344; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:01:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zMd7Zqx1asP1; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0694F424B435; Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211230104031.432C7119D2@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2022 17:01:00 -0800
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BD89055F-5C32-4CBD-92F9-EC37D309946F@amsl.com>
References: <20211230104031.432C7119D2@rfc-editor.org>
To: hartmans-ietf@mit.edu, tcc@vt.edu, khoeper@motorolasolutions.com, emu@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/ZfeK9S08hXy33-ovFgVBs47Vl3o>
Subject: Re: [Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6677 (6802)
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 01:01:06 -0000
Greetings, FYI - this report has been deleted as junk. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Dec 30, 2021, at 2:40 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6677, > "Channel-Binding Support for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Methods". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6802 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Nob Som <aid83019@gmail.com> > > Section: 6677 > > Original Text > ------------- > Technical > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Editorial > > Notes > ----- > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6677 (draft-ietf-emu-chbind-16) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Channel-Binding Support for Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Methods > Publication Date : July 2012 > Author(s) : S. Hartman, Ed., T. Clancy, K. Hoeper > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : EAP Method Update > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6677 (6802) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Emu] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6677 (68… Chris Smiley