IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Emu] WG adoption call for draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Tue, 13 November 2018 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCF5130DDC for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:39:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EoEOTQ_N1eTY for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72230127332 for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 06:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.20.150] (unknown [72.137.155.194]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59EAFEF; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:39:54 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <45e7325b-f5d1-c4b8-edb2-3e39d03989fe@openca.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:39:53 -0500
Cc: emu@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <39E1238A-2E39-4FF4-89C3-2B549C1EA84F@deployingradius.com>
References: <CAOgPGoBGZWbyHYybnMUbKG77Mei3yBOS1HyS4Uso1HKgxq1VNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgPGoAvGm7gfgAHsPHHdO9OU601wp=NY2fb9YjQyh0h6cy3nQ@mail.gmail.com> <45e7325b-f5d1-c4b8-edb2-3e39d03989fe@openca.org>
To: "Dr. Pala" <director@openca.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/lPATcg7UGBANyyzMf28ic-J9cys>
Subject: Re: [Emu] WG adoption call for draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:39:58 -0000


> On Nov 10, 2018, at 5:52 AM, Dr. Pala <director@openca.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I am in favor of addressing the issue of PFS in 3GPP authentication - it is important work that moves cellular network authentication towards more modern approaches and more compatible with IETF technologies.
> 
> This said, I am concerned about the fact that the IPR is not marked as Royalty-Free, therefore I am not in favor of adopting it if the IPR restrictions (fees) are not removed (please let me know if I am mis-interpreting the IPR declaration). I think I missed this point (maybe the jet lag, but it might not have been clear to the room). 
> 
> As a possible way forward (if IPR restrictions are not modified), we could work on something different that is not encumbered by patents restrictions. However, for this, we would need to see the specific claims of the application...

  I share these concerns.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email