Re: [Emu] WG adoption call for draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 11 December 2018 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: emu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F1B130E37 for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:23:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9BcL9xMoLVLW for <emu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B359D130E3C for <emu@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 08:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9266603CF; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:23:23 +0200 (EET)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iCyrpInOyLMJ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:23:21 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:1829::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23A4660254; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:23:21 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <ED694824-8D3B-4504-BA33-A88682C458BA@deployingradius.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 18:23:21 +0200
Cc: "Dr. Pala" <director@openca.org>, emu@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <49776C8A-00C6-4595-B947-5A45F4D61F38@piuha.net>
References: <CAOgPGoBGZWbyHYybnMUbKG77Mei3yBOS1HyS4Uso1HKgxq1VNg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgPGoAvGm7gfgAHsPHHdO9OU601wp=NY2fb9YjQyh0h6cy3nQ@mail.gmail.com> <45e7325b-f5d1-c4b8-edb2-3e39d03989fe@openca.org> <39E1238A-2E39-4FF4-89C3-2B549C1EA84F@deployingradius.com> <932256A8-6381-4EE9-95B2-C56B4E7F52D5@piuha.net> <98AB9912-1110-47F8-A4B0-94CB2E6A302E@deployingradius.com> <BC8F219E-4BE4-4980-A701-F8F296A19A4F@piuha.net> <ED694824-8D3B-4504-BA33-A88682C458BA@deployingradius.com>
To: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/emu/wQJV7weppQMLlYqeMYeumlWmpDU>
Subject: Re: [Emu] WG adoption call for draft-arkko-eap-aka-pfs
X-BeenThere: emu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/emu/>
List-Post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:23:29 -0000

Re: optional but everyone requiring a feature.
 
I think in this case the “can require everyone to do it” is probably far away in the future, in practice. Given that Release 15 does not require this extension, it only requires RFC 5448 EAP-AKA’ (or the bis), this means that there will be lots of phones and networks that only do the base… if you mandated an extension you’d have lots of users having a problem connecting. 

It is not completely unthinkable that at some point you’d be in a situation where there’s enough deployment to start requiring something, but that would certainly be many years away. Plus some portion of 5G deployment happens in so called Option 3 model, which means no new core, no new protocols (incl. EAP) between the network and the UE. Before you can progress away from that and the RFC 5448-only modes, much time will pass.

Jari