Re: [Entmib] entstate-651 Notification Description Changes (Part II)

>On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:45:22PM -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
>I believe this is primarily a matter of turn around times. Perhaps
>you can check with Sharon whether she can allocate some more time
>slots to finalize the Entity State MIB. When will the next revised
>version of the document be posted? Lets work on the document rather
>than this meta discussion which by itself does not move anything
>forward.

I agree that the meta-discussion isn't helping,a nd thanks for 
suggesting that we move back to discussing the document...

Sharon has stated that she should have more time to spend on this 
document between now and the next IETF meeting, so I am hopeful that 
we can get the issues resolved and submit it to the IESG.

Sharon,  could you post a summary of the remaining open issues with 
your proposals for resolution, so that we can see if there is WG 
agreement?

Perhaps we can attempt to reach consensus that these are the only 
remaining issues and that we will submit the document to the IESG 
once they are resolved?

Thanks,
Margaret

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib