IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Entmib] Entity State MIB Next Steps

Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com> Fri, 09 January 2004 13:32 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA29258 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:32:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Aewk6-000626-QX; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 08:32:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AewjV-0005yd-Gm for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 08:31:25 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA29246 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:31:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AewjU-0000Ve-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 08:31:24 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AewiG-0000L9-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 08:30:08 -0500
Received: from smtp.exodus.net ([66.35.230.236]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AewgP-0007gb-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 08:28:13 -0500
Received: from ms101.mail1.com (ms101.mail1.com [209.1.5.174]) by smtp.exodus.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i09F7aw3032089 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 07:07:36 -0800
Received: from ala-mrwtemp.thingmagic.com (unverified [24.61.30.237]) by accounting.espmail.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 5.2.5) with ESMTP id <B0017762230@ms101.mail1.com> for <entmib@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:27:42 -0800
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040109082204.04499668@ms101.mail1.com>
X-Sender: margaret@thingmagic.com@ms101.mail1.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 08:25:57 -0500
To: entmib@ietf.org
From: Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>
In-Reply-To: <200401081533.KAA27936@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Subject: [Entmib] Entity State MIB Next Steps
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

Now that the newest version of the Entity State MIB is available,
the WG has a decision to make.  In my opinion, we have two
choices:

(1) We decide that the structure and objects defined in the
current draft are acceptable, and we send the current draft
to WG Last Call in order to identify and resolve final
issues.

(2) We decide that we want to change the structure or objects
defined in this MIB to make it simpler or more functional.

I would appreciate it if people would respond to this message
with their opinions, so that I can attempt to judge the consensus
of the WG on this issue.

Thanks,
Margaret


_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email