RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Containment Hierach an d entPhysical Containedin
"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol@nortelnetworks.com> Sun, 15 February 2004 19:39 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA20961 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:39:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AsS6X-0002li-D5; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:39:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AsS6E-0002ik-DK for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:38:42 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA20956 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:38:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AsS6B-0005OC-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:38:39 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AsS5F-0005Lt-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:37:41 -0500
Received: from zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.157]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AsS4x-0005JK-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:37:23 -0500
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69]) by zcars0m9.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id i1FJaqg26407 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:36:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <1FNH8YLB>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:36:53 -0500
Message-ID: <3549C09B853DD5119B540002A52CDD340A2A7277@zcard0ka.ca.nortel.com>
From: Sharon Chisholm <schishol@nortelnetworks.com>
To: entmib@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Containment Hierach an d entPhysical Containedin
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:36:50 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-328. The issue will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done. In section 2.1, replace "Physical entities exist within a containment hierarchy. This raises" With "Physical entities exist within a containment hierarchy. Physical containment is defined by the entPhysicalContainedIn object[RFC2737]. This raises" And remove all explanations of what a physical hierarchy is from within the DESCRIPTION clauses. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 4:30 PM To: entmib@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Containment Hierach an d entPhysical Containedin Hi Ok. I'll add a section that defines containment hierarchy and be done with it. Or perhaps there is something in the Entity MIB I can point at. While a containment hierarchy is transitive, I think when we are talking about the states it can't really be for two reasons - Usage definitely can't be transitive - I think transitive starts getting into computed states, which we have defined out of scope. Sharon -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:35 AM To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH] Cc: entmib@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Containment Hierach and entPhysical Containedin On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 01:44:44PM -0500, Sharon Chisholm wrote: > The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-328. The issue > will be considered closed pending the proposed edit being done. > > In the various object definitions replace phrases like > > "as defined by a value of > entPhysicalContainedIn that references this entity" > > With one like > > "as defined by the entPhysicalContainedIn object." So this is not generally transitive? I like Dave Perkin's suggestion on this issue. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib _______________________________________________ Entmib mailing list Entmib@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
- RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Contai… Sharon Chisholm
- RE: [Entmib] FW: [psg.com #328] AutoReply: Contai… Sharon Chisholm