Re: [Entmib] entity mib support for tcif

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de> Sun, 05 October 2003 13:17 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA15058 for <entmib-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:17:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A68kv-000159-0f; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 09:17:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A68kO-00014p-Bt for entmib@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 09:16:28 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA15043 for <entmib@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:16:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A68kM-0001sr-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 09:16:26 -0400
Received: from merkur.iu-bremen.de ([212.201.44.27]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1A68kM-0001sT-00 for entmib@ietf.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 09:16:26 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merkur.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A6856B42; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 15:15:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from james (unknown [212.201.46.151]) by merkur.iu-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0149D56B36; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 15:15:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by james (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1319E81D0; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 15:15:51 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 15:15:51 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de>
To: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
Cc: Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com>, entmib@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Entmib] entity mib support for tcif
Message-ID: <20031005131551.GC870@iu-bremen.de>
Reply-To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
Mail-Followup-To: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>, Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com>, entmib@ietf.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10309071508120.6520-100000@shell4.bayarea.net> <93401232EABAAB4EA430E13ECC701CCF2A0D3E@yorktown.pedestalnetworks.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20031002101643.027ea170@fedex.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20031002101643.027ea170@fedex.cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre8
Sender: entmib-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: entmib-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: entmib@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IETF Entity MIB WG <entmib.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:entmib@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib>, <mailto:entmib-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:20:12AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> 
> I prefer (3b).  There are lots of MIB modules that
> import something from ENTITY-MIB (usually entPhysicalIndex)
> and none of these RFCs can advance to DS until the
> Entity MIB advances.  I think it will take a long
> time to get the supplemental objects published,
> and then it will take at least a year to get another
> implementation report together. 

Which module do you have in mind?

$ cd /usr/local/share/mibs/ietf
$ grep ENTITY-MIB *
ENTITY-MIB:ENTITY-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB:                FROM ENTITY-MIB
ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB:    MODULE ENTITY-MIB
PTOPO-MIB:        FROM ENTITY-MIB

Am I missing something?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany

_______________________________________________
Entmib mailing list
Entmib@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib