AW: [Enum] Fwd: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service'to Proposed Standard
"Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at> Fri, 04 February 2005 09:26 UTC
From: Stastny Richard <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 04:26:38 -0500
To: lconroy <"richard at shockey.us">
Subject: AW: [Enum] Fwd: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service'to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <32755D354E6B65498C3BD9FD496C7D46FAE9@oefeg-s04.oefeg.loc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Status: R
Lawrence wrote: >The vpim:mailto in -routing-08 is fine, it's just the voice:dir that's >a problem. >Can we sort this clash please? Fully agree. I propose to use instead of voice:dir either vpim:ldap (best choice) or vpim:dir If this is changed, I have no futher objections against the draft, except the enumservice definitions to be sorted out by Patrik and IANA regards Richard ________________________________ Von: enum-bounces at ietf.org im Auftrag von lconroy Gesendet: Fr 04.02.2005 00:56 An: Richard Shockey Cc: enum at ietf.org Betreff: Re: [Enum] Fwd: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service'to Proposed Standard Hi Rich, I have one comment on this draft as it stands - over my dead and smoking body. 'voice' (as an Enumservice type) has already been "booked" in the VOVI drafts. Vovi-02 has only just expired, and we haven't yet shipped Vovi-3 only to refresh it as we're awaiting clarification on what the heck happened with Vovi's last call - this was to have taken place once we updated the draft to reflect concerns with Vovi-1, which we did, since which time... As the Enumservice type 'voice' is the 'top' of the IANA tree, we can't have two totally different Enumservices with the same type string, even if they have different subtypes. BTW, that's why it's an interesting choice to do Enumservices in separate WGs, and it's why many thanks to Rich for cross-posting, as I'm not on the vpim ML - why would I be? Then again, why would a VPIMmer be bothered with the ENUM ML? The vpim:mailto in -routing-08 is fine, it's just the voice:dir that's a problem. Can we sort this clash please? all the best, Lawrence On 3 Feb 2005, at 16:10, Richard Shockey wrote: > well you had better get your comments in now ... personally I dont see > a problem with Greg's definitions. > >> X-test-idtracker: no >> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce at ietf.org> >> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary at ietf.org> >> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:07:01 -0500 >> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) >> X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25 >> Cc: vpim at ietf.org >> Subject: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service' to >> Proposed >> Standard >> X-BeenThere: vpim at ietf.org >> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 >> Reply-To: iesg at ietf.org >> List-Id: Voice Profile for Internet Mail Discussion Archive >> <vpim.ietf.org> >> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vpim>, >> <mailto:vpim-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> >> List-Post: <mailto:vpim at ietf.org> >> List-Help: <mailto:vpim-request at ietf.org?subject=help> >> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vpim>, >> <mailto:vpim-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe> >> Sender: vpim-bounces at ietf.org >> X-Keywords: >> >> >> The IESG has received a request from the Voice Profile for Internet >> Mail WG to >> consider the following documents: >> >> - 'Voice Messaging Directory Service ' >> <draft-ietf-vpim-vpimdir-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard >> - 'Voice Message Routing Service ' >> <draft-ietf-vpim-routing-08.txt> as a Proposed Standard >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the >> iesg at ietf.org or ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-02-17. >> >> The files can be obtained via >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-vpimdir-09.txt >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-routing-08.txt >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> VPIM mailing list >> VPIM at ietf.org >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vpim > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives > NeuStar Inc. > 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 > sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141 at fwd.pulver.com > ENUM +87810-13313-31331 > PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683, Fax: +1 > 815.333.1237 > <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or > <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> > <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > > > _______________________________________________ > enum mailing list > enum at ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum > > --------------------------------------- lawrence conroy |tel:+44-1794-833666 _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- AW: [Enum] Fwd: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messagin… Stastny Richard