AW: [Enum] Fwd: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service'to Proposed Standard

"Stastny Richard" <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at> Fri, 04 February 2005 09:26 UTC

From: Stastny Richard <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 04:26:38 -0500
To: lconroy <"richard at shockey.us">
Subject: AW: [Enum] Fwd: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service'to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <32755D354E6B65498C3BD9FD496C7D46FAE9@oefeg-s04.oefeg.loc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Status: R

Lawrence wrote:
>The vpim:mailto in -routing-08 is fine, it's just the voice:dir that's
>a problem.
>Can we sort this clash please? 
 
Fully agree.

I propose to use instead of
voice:dir
either 
vpim:ldap (best choice) or
vpim:dir
 
If this is changed, I have no futher objections against the draft, 
except the enumservice definitions to be sorted out by Patrik and IANA
 
regards
Richard



________________________________

Von: enum-bounces at ietf.org im Auftrag von lconroy
Gesendet: Fr 04.02.2005 00:56
An: Richard Shockey
Cc: enum at ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [Enum] Fwd: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service'to Proposed Standard 



Hi Rich,
   I have one comment on this draft as it stands - over my dead and
smoking body.

'voice' (as an Enumservice type) has already been "booked" in the VOVI
drafts.
Vovi-02 has only just expired, and we haven't yet shipped Vovi-3 only
to refresh
it as we're awaiting clarification on what the heck happened with
Vovi's last call
- this was to have taken place once we updated the draft to reflect
concerns with
Vovi-1, which we did, since which time...

As the Enumservice type 'voice' is the 'top' of the IANA tree, we can't
have two
totally different Enumservices with the same type string, even if they
have different
subtypes.

BTW, that's why it's an interesting choice to do Enumservices in
separate WGs,
and it's why many thanks to Rich for cross-posting, as I'm not on the
vpim ML
- why would I be? Then again, why would a VPIMmer be bothered with the
ENUM ML?

The vpim:mailto in -routing-08 is fine, it's just the voice:dir that's
a problem.
Can we sort this clash please?

all the best,
   Lawrence

On 3 Feb 2005, at 16:10, Richard Shockey wrote:
> well you had better get your comments in now ... personally I dont see
> a problem with Greg's definitions.
>
>> X-test-idtracker: no
>> To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce at ietf.org>
>> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary at ietf.org>
>> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:07:01 -0500
>> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
>> X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
>> Cc: vpim at ietf.org
>> Subject: [vpim] Last Call: 'Voice Messaging Directory Service' to
>> Proposed
>>         Standard
>> X-BeenThere: vpim at ietf.org
>> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
>> Reply-To: iesg at ietf.org
>> List-Id: Voice Profile for Internet Mail Discussion Archive
>> <vpim.ietf.org>
>> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vpim>,
>>         <mailto:vpim-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> List-Post: <mailto:vpim at ietf.org>
>> List-Help: <mailto:vpim-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
>> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vpim>,
>>         <mailto:vpim-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
>> Sender: vpim-bounces at ietf.org
>> X-Keywords:
>>
>>
>> The IESG has received a request from the Voice Profile for Internet
>> Mail WG to
>> consider the following documents:
>>
>> - 'Voice Messaging Directory Service '
>>    <draft-ietf-vpim-vpimdir-09.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>> - 'Voice Message Routing Service '
>>    <draft-ietf-vpim-routing-08.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action.  Please send any comments to the
>> iesg at ietf.org or ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2005-02-17.
>>
>> The files can be obtained via
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-vpimdir-09.txt
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-routing-08.txt
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> VPIM mailing list
>> VPIM at ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vpim
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
> NeuStar Inc.
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza  -   Sterling, VA  20166
> sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org   sip:57141 at fwd.pulver.com
> ENUM +87810-13313-31331
> PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683,  Fax: +1
> 815.333.1237
> <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or
> <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> enum at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>
>
---------------------------------------
lawrence conroy    |tel:+44-1794-833666


_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum




_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum