Re: [Enum] Protocol Action: 'IANA Registration for ENUMservices web and ft' to Proposed Standard
Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com> Thu, 09 September 2004 12:10 UTC
From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 08:10:32 -0400
To: Richard Shockey <"richard at shockey.us">
Subject: Re: [Enum] Protocol Action: 'IANA Registration for ENUMservices web and ft' to Proposed Standard
In-Reply-To: <E1C4ipg-0003Ga-2b@megatron.ietf.org>
Message-ID: <41406150.1D6A057F@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Status: R
Richard and all, I am sorry I mis-keyed your name. However my comments were directed *Percisely* to the WG activities. Perhaps your reading skills are limited, or you did not adequately interpret my previous comments properly? I fully recognize that neestar folks have a nagging habit of doing so more frequently than reasonable... :/ Richard Shockey wrote: > At 12:14 AM 9/8/2004, Jeff Williams wrote: > > >Dear secretariat and all, > > > > Not surprising to yet again see the IESG screw up again. As Mr. Shokey > >know full well this proposed "Standard" is not in keeping with any consensus > >from the ENUM working group. > > > - 'IANA Registration for ENUMservices web and ft ' > > > <draft-ietf-enum-webft-01.txt> as a Proposed Standard > > The document in question was given extensive discussion in the context of > RFC 3761 and the IANA registration process for enumservices. The > documentary record is quite clear on this. > > All proper procedures were taken in accordance with RFC 2026. > > There was no objections raised at Working Group Last call and the documents > were then properly submitted for publication. > > As usual, Mr. Williams you have obviously not taken the time or trouble to > read RFC 2026 which defines the Internet Standards Process, other wise you > would know that you would have had one last avenue of appeal during IESG > last call. But again ...you raised no objection then either. > > In the future I would appreciate it if A. you could spell my name > correctly. B. confine your future remarks to WG items at hand. > > ################# > > Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 10:24:55 -0400 > To: enum at ietf.org > From: Richard Shockey <rich.shockey at neustar.biz> > Cc: paf at cisco.com, mankin at psg.com, jon.peterson at neustar.biz > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > Subject: [Enum] ENUM Working Last Call on two enumservice field documents. > Sender: enum-admin at ietf.org > Errors-To: enum-admin at ietf.org > X-BeenThere: enum at ietf.org > X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 > Precedence: bulk > List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, > <mailto:enum-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> > List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org> > List-Post: <mailto:enum at ietf.org> > List-Help: <mailto:enum-request at ietf.org?subject=help> > List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, > <mailto:enum-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe> > Status: > > This is a formal request for final comments within the IETF ENUM WG > working group for two documents. The documents listed below are being > proposed for forwarding on to the IESG for consideration as Standards Track > RFC. > > These documents are working group products, which have been discussed > during 2002-2003. > > The purpose of a working group Last Call is in the style of "speak now or > forever hold your peace" in case there are fundamental objections which have > not gotten previous or adequate discussion, or minor errors which need > correction. > > The 2 week Last Call will begin immediately and will end on July 2 at 12PM EST > > Title : Registration for enumservices of group messages > Author(s) : R. Brandner et al. > Filename : draft-ietf-enum-msg-00.txt > Pages : 17 > Date : 2003-6-16 > > This document registers a group of 'enumservices' [5] to be used to > indicate that the associated resources are capable of receiving > discrete messages. > Specifically, the 'enumservices' registered with this document are > 'email', 'fax', 'sms', 'ems' and 'mms' using the URI schemes > 'mailto:' and 'tel:'. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-msg-00.txt > > ################# > > Title : Registration for enumservices web and ft > Author(s) : R. Brandner et al. > Filename : draft-ietf-enum-webft-00.txt > Pages : 13 > Date : 2003-6-16 > > This document registers a group of 'enumservices' [2] to be used to > indicate that the associated resources are primarily sources for > information. > Specifically, the 'enumservices' registered with this document are > 'web' and 'ft' using the URI schemes 'http:', 'https:' and 'ftp:'. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-webft-00.txt > > ################# > > X-test-idtracker: no > To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce at ietf.org> > From: The IESG <iesg-secretary at ietf.org> > Message-Id: <E1BuysG-0002n6-KP at megatron.ietf.org> > Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:35:00 -0400 > X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) > X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad > Cc: enum at ietf.org > Subject: [Enum] Last Call: 'IANA Registration for ENUMservices web and ft' > to Proposed Standard > X-BeenThere: enum at ietf.org > X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 > Precedence: list > Reply-To: iesg at ietf.org > List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org> > List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, > <mailto:enum-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> > List-Post: <mailto:enum at ietf.org> > List-Help: <mailto:enum-request at ietf.org?subject=help> > List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, > <mailto:enum-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe> > Sender: enum-bounces at ietf.org > Errors-To: enum-bounces at ietf.org > Status: > > The IESG has received a request from the Telephone Number Mapping WG to > consider the following document: > > - 'IANA Registration for ENUMservices web and ft ' > <draft-ietf-enum-webft-01.txt> as a Proposed Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the > iesg at ietf.org or ietf at ietf.org mailing lists by 2004-08-25. > > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-webft-01.txt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives > NeuStar Inc. > 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 > sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141 at fwd.pulver.com > ENUM +87810-13313-31331 > PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683, Fax: +1 815.333.1237 > <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> > <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!) "Be precise in the use of words and expect precision from others" - Pierre Abelard "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com Registered Email addr with the USPS Contact Number: 214-244-4827 _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- Re: [Enum] Protocol Action: 'IANA Registration fo… Jeff Williams
- Re: [Enum] Protocol Action: 'IANA Registration fo… Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Protocol Action: 'IANA Registration fo… Jeff Williams
- Re: [Enum] Protocol Action: 'IANA Registration fo… Allison Mankin