Re: [Enum] Review of draft-yu-enumservice-sms-smpp WG ITEM?

Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie.hoeneisen@switch.ch> Fri, 09 May 2008 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <enum-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: enum-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-enum-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1FB3A68C4; Fri, 9 May 2008 12:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20643A68B7 for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2008 12:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wnf+MGKQ5+8f for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 May 2008 12:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from medel.switch.ch (medel.switch.ch [IPv6:2001:620:0:14:214:4fff:fe75:4774]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C133A6866 for <enum@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 May 2008 12:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.59.6.129] (helo=machb.switch.ch) by medel.switch.ch with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bernie.hoeneisen@switch.ch>) id 1JuYLx-0006aL-WD; Fri, 09 May 2008 21:34:02 +0200
Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 21:33:57 +0200
From: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie.hoeneisen@switch.ch>
X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@machb
To: lconroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <8414E861-E85B-4F42-AA7B-44D398EBC17E@insensate.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805092122320.27945@machb>
References: <480F5861.3050006@enum.at> <005a01c8a65e$9c799710$d56cc530$@us> <147a01c8a6fe$e4def4a0$ae9cdde0$@us> <20080428143916.GD4159@x27.adm.denic.de> <04be01c8a94d$7f33b450$7d9b1cf0$@us> <8414E861-E85B-4F42-AA7B-44D398EBC17E@insensate.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SWITCH-SCANNER: bypassed
Cc: enum@ietf.org, 'Peter Koch' <pk@denic.de>, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Subject: Re: [Enum] Review of draft-yu-enumservice-sms-smpp WG ITEM?
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: enum-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Lawrence et al.

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, lconroy wrote:

> However, I'd hate to see 3761bis and the guide held up too long either.
>
> IMHO, the Guide is pretty close to complete.
> The only real question is whether or not we need to do a refreshed
> "X- guide" soon. Either way, I think the "main" guide is ready to roll.

We jmade clear in Service Guide [draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-09], 
that Service Guide is only about "regular" Enumservice registrations, and 
therefore does not include "X-" registrations.

As you know, "X-" registrations are handled in a separate document 
<draft-ietf-enum-x-service-regs>, which does neither hold up RFC3761bis 
nor Service Guide. I'll update (or rather completely rewrite) it soon as 
Service Guide seems to be pretty stable by now.

cheers,
  Bernie
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum