Re: [Enum] New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM
Lawrence Conroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk> Thu, 05 March 2009 10:00 UTC
Return-Path: <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
X-Original-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391F028C37E for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 02:00:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x-O05PMIaTJa for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 02:00:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from insensate.co.uk (norman.insensate.co.uk [213.152.49.123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCD228C37B for <enum@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 02:00:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6???1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insensate.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA31FDCAD; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:01:21 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <95CBE4B6-A8B4-4348-A545-F02F658A4D9E@insensate.co.uk>
From: Lawrence Conroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
To: Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903050947050.30758@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="WINDOWS-1252"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:01:22 +0000
References: <C5D459CC.270A%d.malas@cablelabs.com> <046f01c99d29$5f228e90$1d67abb0$@us> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903050947050.30758@softronics.hoeneisen.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: IETF ENUM list <enum@ietf.org>, 'Daryl Malas' <d.malas@cablelabs.com>, 'Tom Creighton' <Tom_Creighton@cable.comcast.com>
Subject: Re: [Enum] New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/enum>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:00:57 -0000
Hi Bernie, folks, Agreed. If there is a crucial reason to force this through the IETF on the old track, then let's discuss this at the ENUM WG meeting :). all the best, Lawrence On 5 Mar 2009, at 08:47, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: > Hi Rich > > Why don't we use the new process as decribed in > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide > > for Trunk Group? So, the document does not need to be WG item. > I believe it is not worth doing anything according to the old > process at > this point in time. > > cheers, > Bernie > > > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Richard Shockey wrote: > >> To the list .. >> >> FYI this draft essentially supersedes the previous draft that Tom >> Creighton >> and I co authored earlier. >> >> As far as I’m personally concerned this is still a legitimate WG >> item as it >> describes, in another way , work we had already approved. It does >> have >> significant applicability in the market today. >> >> I have no issues with this proceeding as a ENUM WG document unless >> there are >> objections. We are close to closure but fast tracking this to WGLC >> could be >> of help to operators looking at this type of function. >> >> Comments? Any objections to a fast track? >> >> From: enum-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:enum-bounces@ietf.org] On >> Behalf Of >> Daryl Malas >> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 6:16 PM >> To: enum@ietf.org >> Cc: Tom Creighton >> Subject: [Enum] New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM >> >> All, >> We have submitted a new draft describing another method for >> incorporating >> trunk group information in an ENUM response. >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> Title : Trunk Group Use in ENUM >> Author(s) : D. Malas, T. Creighton >> Filename : draft-malas-enum-trunk-sip-00.txt >> Pages : 7 >> Date : 2009-03-04 >> This document concludes that incorporating trunk group parameters >> into an Electronic Number (ENUM) response for the Session Initiation >> Protocol (SIP) [RFC3261] service URI is a more effective approach >> compared to defining a new ENUM service type for a 'trunk'. Upon >> further review of the existing ENUM trunk group draft >> [I-D.ietf-enum-trunkgroup] and practical operator experience, this >> draft recommends the use of the current trunk group contexts as >> defined in [RFC4904] as additional parameters in the E2U+SIP >> enumservice NAPTR record [RFC3403] URI. >> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-malas-enum-trunk-sip-00.txt >> Regards, >> Daryl >> ----------------- >> Daryl Malas >> CableLabs >> (o) +1 303 661 3302 >> (f) +1 303 661 9199 >> mailto:d.malas@cablelabs.com > _______________________________________________ > enum mailing list > enum@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM Daryl Malas
- Re: [Enum] New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [Enum] New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM Lawrence Conroy
- Re: [Enum] New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM Don Troshynski
- Re: [Enum] New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM Daryl Malas