[Enum] NITS review for draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-00
Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at> Tue, 07 February 2006 09:37 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F6PI3-00057r-Es; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 04:37:39 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F6PI1-00057P-Ge for enum@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 04:37:37 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA07129 for <enum@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 04:35:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [193.80.224.123] (helo=kahua.nona.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6PUH-0008Oc-CE for enum@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 04:50:24 -0500
Received: from [10.10.0.63] (nat.labs.nic.at [::ffff:83.136.33.3]) (AUTH: PLAIN axelm, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by pahula with esmtp; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:37:03 +0100 id 0006C09B.43E86A3F.00004F44
Message-ID: <43E86A30.5030209@enum.at>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:36:48 +0100
From: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at>
Organization: enum.at GmbH
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: enum@ietf.org, Otmar Lendl <otmar.lendl@enum.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc:
Subject: [Enum] NITS review for draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-00
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: enum-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-bounces@ietf.org
All, i've performed a NITS review of said draft - Otmar will provide an updated version before Dallas. Generally, the document is in a good shape, and i'd be happy if we could get this out of the door together with the other validation documents pretty soon - they have been lurking around now for over a year. My comments are as follows: - idnits complains that references are not split between Normative and Informative. - Introduction: "ENUM" needs to be spelled out, E.164 is missing the reference. I'm unsure whether "XML" needs to be spelled out or is well known - question to the RFC editors pending. - Data requirements: I'd add "piece of" between "only .. data". "Token's" should be changed to "Tokens" in the second bullet. - Digital Signature: XML-DSIG needs to be spelled out. Unsure about "RSA-SHA1". Reference to X.509 is missing. "CA" needs to be spelled out. - Field descriptions: Tags are sometimes called "tag", sometimes "attributes" or "strings". This needs to be unified. The "computerized directory assistance" fragment should be moved in front of the first occurance of "E.115". - Verification stuff: This should probably be generalized, since not only the Registry might do verification of the token. Especially the security considerations section would benefit from that. - XML schemas: Please add "BEGIN" and "END" to the schemas to aid automatic schema extraction (see eg. RFC4114 for example). Both schemas pass the checking at http://www.w3c.org/2001/03/webdata/xsv tia, Alex Mayrhofer _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] NITS review for draft-ietf-enum-validation… Alexander Mayrhofer