AW: [Enum] Sufficient information in NAPTRs, MSG, and VOVI

My esteemed co-chair,

>What I want is a comprehensive tel registration document and we need that
>now for several reasons.

>What I would like to see is where tel is the type and everything else is a
>subtype.

I do not want to discuss 
>tel:voice
here

but if you want to define

>tel:fax
>tel:sms
>tel:mms

then plese submit a draft explaining the difference to

fax:tel
sms:tel
mms:tel

defined in the RFC-tobe
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-msg-04.txt

Richard

>i dont want them reversed  IMHO voice is not a "type" in this  context

>maybe

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum