RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers a borken addressing system?

"Pfautz, Penn L, NEO" <ppfautz@att.com> Tue, 07 February 2006 13:50 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F6TET-0000Ak-OL; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 08:50:13 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F6TE2-0008Sw-6i; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 08:50:06 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA26709; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:47:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail124.messagelabs.com ([85.158.136.19]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6TQE-0000WH-LZ; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:02:26 -0500
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: ppfautz@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-124.messagelabs.com!1139320103!6908890!21
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.9.1; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [134.24.146.4]
Received: (qmail 9609 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2006 13:49:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO attrh2i.attrh.att.com) (134.24.146.4) by server-5.tower-124.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 7 Feb 2006 13:49:22 -0000
Received: from ACCLUST02EVS1.ugd.att.com (135.37.16.8) by attrh2i.attrh.att.com (7.2.052) id 43CF0375002D9372; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:49:20 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Speermint] and are phone numbers a borken addressing system?
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 08:49:20 -0500
Message-ID: <34DA635B184A644DA4588E260EC0A25A0C197939@ACCLUST02EVS1.ugd.att.com>
Thread-Topic: [Speermint] and are phone numbers a borken addressing system?
Thread-Index: AcYrwI7+uWvK8J5uRVuyJ8CBkI74WgAJ7DSQ
From: "Pfautz, Penn L, NEO" <ppfautz@att.com>
To: Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at>, Duane <duane@e164.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: enum@ietf.org, speermint@ietf.org, lconroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>, Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski@verisign.com>
X-BeenThere: speermint@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the speermint working group <speermint.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint>, <mailto:speermint-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/speermint>
List-Post: <mailto:speermint@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:speermint-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint>, <mailto:speermint-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: speermint-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: speermint-bounces@ietf.org

All neat stuff I'm sure. But it lacks the kind of universality and
authoritativeness that are ultimately required for a system that's going
to be more than an adjunct, however popular. 
My point about IM was simply that the major offers don't make much of an
attempt to interoperate which puts them where the telephone system was
about a century ago when you could only call me if we had the same phone
company. Likewise the   "non-connected" VoIP systems: how does
Googletalk interwork with Skype? 
Pity, because IP handles the interconnection problem (at layer 3) so
elegantly compared to the phone network. The object of Speermint is do
bring this elegance to layer 5. I hope we'll do that, but if you want to
make the PSTN go away you'll need an industrial strength addressing
system. ENUM is great because is marries the good properties of E.164 to
the flexibility of the net. I haven't seen anything else that gets the
whole job done.

My personal view...

Penn  

-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 3:29 AM
To: Duane
Cc: Pfautz, Penn L, NEO; enum@ietf.org; speermint@ietf.org; Tony
Rutkowski; lconroy
Subject: Re: [Speermint] Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags
todistinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows

Duane wrote:
> Pfautz, Penn L, NEO wrote:
> 
>> Right now, however, phone numbers are a little like democracy - "the
>> worst system imaginable except for all others"
>> P2P folks don't seem serious about interoperability  (look at IM) and
>> only TNs provide reachability from the PSTN.
> 
> 
> Not entirely true, the guys from Jabber use enum lookups and resolve 
> Jabber IDs from our zone (e164.org).
> 
> Also we're currently working on plugins for thunderbird/firefox to do 
> phone number to email/website with the idea of unification on business

> cards of 10 different pieces of contact information to just a phone 
> number if people want to go that route.

FYI: There already exists a firefox plugin (firefox 1.0.x only).
http://falb.at/enum4firefox/enummapper-0.1.0.xpi

regards
klaus


_______________________________________________
Speermint mailing list
Speermint@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/speermint