Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows

Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> Tue, 07 February 2006 19:05 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F6YA2-0005FE-UQ; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:05:58 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1F6Y9z-0005DY-Jj; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:05:57 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA21412; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:04:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6YMI-0003DT-2j; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:18:39 -0500
Received: from [10.31.13.183] (neustargw.va.neustar.com [209.173.53.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k17J6BrP000542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:06:12 -0800
Message-ID: <43E8EF7B.9000104@shockey.us>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:05:31 -0500
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stastny Richard <Richard.Stastny@oefeg.at>
Subject: Re: [Enum] a suggestion re: using flags to distinguish post-ENUM signaling f lows
References: <32755D354E6B65498C3BD9FD496C7D462C4820@oefeg-s04.oefeg.loc>
In-Reply-To: <32755D354E6B65498C3BD9FD496C7D462C4820@oefeg-s04.oefeg.loc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Found to be clean
X-Songbird-From: richard@shockey.us
X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 538aad3a3c4f01d8b6a6477ca4248793
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: enum@ietf.org, speermint@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: enum-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-bounces@ietf.org

Stastny Richard wrote:
>> The second one is (essentially) number portability. My SIP URI can change from sip:mstafford@provider-A.net to >sip:mstafford@provider-B.biz. As long as my phone number stays the same, it can be used to obtain my current SIP URI.
> 
> What I want to have is SIP URI portability too, or in other words: I want to have my sip URI sip:richard@stastny.com
> hosted by one provider and the possibility to port this to another.
> 
> Especially if I am a company.
>  
> For more information see the ECMA christmas wish-list presented today at ETSI TISPAN:
> Technical Report TR/91
> Enterprise Communication in Next Generation Corporate Networks (NGCN) involving Public Next Generation Networks (NGN)
> (December 2005)
> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-TR/TR-091.pdf
>  
> and also
> Technical Report TR/92
> Corporate Telecommunication Networks - Mobility for Enterprise Communications
> (December 2005)
> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-TR/TR-092.pdf
>  
> The scenarios and requirements described in these two documents will not
> be really easy to implement with NGNs ;-)
> Of course they want to have best of both sides: peering with each other in all variants
> AND in addition to be connected to an NGN, just to be on the safe side.
> One could also say: the overflow traffic is for the telcos (say max 20%)


And ..just to make sure everyone is totally confused and bewildered by 
all of this, the SIP Forum is very close to publishing its Proposed 
Recommendation on IP-PBX to Service Provider interface.

Draft version four of the IP PBX / SP Interoperability specification is 
now available online for your review at the following URL:

The list for this document is taking final comments for the next 30 days.


http://data.memberclicks.com/bbattach/123566/sf-draft-twg-IP_PBX_SP_Interop-sibley-v4.pdf



 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Director - Member of Technical Staff
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza  -   Sterling, VA  20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org   sip:57141(at)fwd.pulver.com
ENUM +87810-13313-31331
PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile +1 703.593.2683
Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or
<mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
<http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum