RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed?
"Yu, James" <james.yu@neustar.biz> Thu, 21 February 2002 04:09 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA29472 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:09:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id XAA11473 for enum-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:09:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA10754; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:00:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA10682 for <enum@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:00:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pine.neustar.com (pine.neustar.com [209.173.57.70]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA29313 for <enum@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:00:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from chiimc01.il.neustar.com (dmz1.il.neustar.com [209.173.57.65]) by pine.neustar.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g1L3xT013561; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:59:29 -0600
Received: by chiimc01.il.neustar.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <FLJZ2JZM>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:59:24 -0600
Message-ID: <23309E398D84D5119D0F00306E075139ECEC5F@dc02.npac.com>
From: "Yu, James" <james.yu@neustar.biz>
To: 'Michael Mealling' <michael@neonym.net>, Lawrence Conroy <lwc@roke.co.uk>
Cc: enum@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed?
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 21:59:23 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
> > > > > To which I add more questions on the TripleDS thicket: > > Question - is the AUS "+494023451234" or is it "494023451234"? > > The AUS is the second one. The '+' is extraneous here so its > removed to make the Key as simple as possible but still useable. > Mike, is it a typo? The AUS is the first one, "+494023451234." I believe that Patrik intentionally keep the "+" for the regular expression mapping use. James _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Brandner Rudolf
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Lawrence Conroy
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Michael Mealling
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Clive D.W. Feather
- [Enum] Re: DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Michael Mealling
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Shaw, Robert
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Randy Bush
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? David Conrad
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Lawrence Conroy
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Stastny, Richard
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Lawrence Conroy
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Patrik Fältström
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Dave Crocker
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Stastny, Richard
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Shaw, Robert
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Michael Mealling
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Dave Crocker
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Yu, James
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Michael Mealling
- RE: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Michael Mealling
- FW: [Enum] DDDS, DNS clarification needed? Stastny, Richard