Re: [Enum] Re. 2916bis
Jim Reid <Jim.Reid@nominum.com> Thu, 21 February 2002 00:35 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA24854 for <enum-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:35:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id TAA02212 for enum-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:35:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA01546; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:26:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA01496 for <enum@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:26:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shell.nominum.com (shell.nominum.com [128.177.192.160]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA24741 for <enum@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:26:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from shell.nominum.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD933190C; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:26:14 -0800 (PST)
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Cc: "Yu, James" <james.yu@neustar.biz>, 'Lawrence Conroy' <lwc@roke.co.uk>, enum@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Enum] Re. 2916bis
In-Reply-To: Message from Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com> of "Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:03:14 +0100." <2852914.1014246194@localhost>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:26:14 -0800
Message-ID: <18027.1014251174@shell.nominum.com>
From: Jim Reid <Jim.Reid@nominum.com>
Sender: enum-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: enum-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
Forgive me, but could someone please explain why we need to say anything about NAPTR records in 2916bis? I thought this document defined a protocol for mapping E.164 numbers into domain names. _______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
- [Enum] Re. 2916bis Lawrence Conroy
- [Enum] Re: Re. 2916bis Patrik Fältström
- RE: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Yu, James
- RE: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Jim Reid
- RE: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Yu, James
- RE: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Lawrence Conroy
- RE: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Lawrence Conroy
- Re: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Jim Reid
- Re: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Michael Mealling
- RE: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Yu, James
- RE: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] Re. 2916bis Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Enum] How long will it take to update a NAPT… Jim Reid
- Re: [Enum] How long will it take to update a NAPT… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Enum] Re: Public Keys in ENUM Jim Reid
- Re: [Enum] Re: Public Keys in ENUM Michael Mealling
- Re: [Enum] Re: Public Keys in ENUM David Conrad
- Re: [Enum] Re: Public Keys in ENUM Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Enum] On the question of DNSSEC and recommen… Jim Reid
- Re: [Enum] non-E.164 Numbers in ENUM Mike Hammer