Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM RESTART - Secondrequest for guidence
Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at> Thu, 14 May 2009 08:35 UTC
Return-Path: <alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at>
X-Original-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: enum@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D703A6CB7 for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 01:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.563
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, HOST_EQ_STATICB=1.372]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QGu-pGam7taT for <enum@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 01:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kahua.nona.net (static.88-198-7-53.clients.your-server.de [88.198.7.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BECF3A6BFC for <enum@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2009 01:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.58] ([::ffff:218.208.119.2]) (AUTH: PLAIN axelm, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by moana with esmtp; Thu, 14 May 2009 10:36:27 +0200 id 00045982.4A0BD80C.000043E7
Message-ID: <4A0BD7C8.5050903@enum.at>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:35:20 +0200
From: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@enum.at>
Organization: enum.at GmbH
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: enum@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM RESTART - Secondrequest for guidence
X-BeenThere: enum@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/enum>
List-Post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:35:00 -0000
Richard, fellow WG members, I agree with Peter, as i think the real question is whether the WG want to continue pursue the draft-ietf-enum-trunkgroup ENUMservice or not. The question whether the group wants to adopt the draft-malas-enum-trunk-sip is seperate from that - but i like the way that Peter proposed. > 1) Is anybody but the authors/editors of the respective drafts believes the WG > should say anything in this direction (trunk groups). [But see the "price tag" > under (4)] I think it is somehow *related* to ENUM because of the Enumservice that we are trying to get rid. Otherwise, i don't see why it would fit into ENUM. For example, it might well fit into DISPATCH as well? > 2) Do you agree to abandon the approach in draft-ietf-enum-trunkgroup-00.txt? Yes > 3) Is the content of draft-malas-enum-trunk-sip-00.txt a better start instead? Yes > 4) Is anybody willing to review draft-malas-enum-trunk-sip-00.txt? If it becomes an ENUM WG document, i might have to, being the secretary of the ENUM WG. > Then publish draft-malas-enum-trunk-sip-00.txt as draft-ietf-enum-trunkgroup-01.txt, > changing the intended state to Informational. I would prefer if the WG concensus would be to remove draft-ietf-enum-trunkgroup from the WG "menu" entirely, and documenting the decision in draft-malas-enum-trunk-sip, but find a WG that suits better such SIP operational issues than the ENUM group. The solution that Peter proposed is also viable, if authors and chairs believe that's a faster way. I just don't think the WG should accept new work, given it's current status of being slowly move to the pathology department. Just to make clear: Content-wise, i definitely prefer the solution proposed in draft-malas-enum-trunk-sip. I'm just not entirely happy with the sloppy process. Alex
- Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM… Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM… Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM… Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM… Daryl Malas
- Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM… Don Troshynski
- Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM… Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM… Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM… Peter Koch
- Re: [Enum] WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM… Bernie Hoeneisen