Re: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents

[James Galvin <[e-mail]>]

We've gotten all "+1" on these 5 documents so I'm going to make the entries
in the datatracker to adopt these documents.

Jim



On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:01 PM, James Galvin <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Since these documents were included in the charter we're going to start by
> adopting them as a group.  In the future we should expect to make a
> decision on each document separately.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/
>
> Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as a working
> group document?  If you, now is the time to speak up and tell us all why.
>
> We'd like to suggest a relatively short time period for objections in this
> case.  We have all known about these documents for some time so it seems
> reasonable to just get started and see where the detailed reviews takes us.
>
> If folks would please respond to the list by close of business everywhere
> Wednesday with either a "+1" to accept all documents or a message noting
> your objection that would be great!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim and Antoin
>
>