Re: [eppext] adopt documents as working group documents

+1

> On 14 Jan 2014, at 0:58, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 on adopting all of the documents.
> 
> Scott
> 
> On Jan 13, 2014, at 3:01 PM, "James Galvin" <galvin@elistx.com> wrote:
> 
>> Since these documents were included in the charter we're going to start by adopting them as a group.  In the future we should expect to make a decision on each document separately.
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hollenbeck-epp-ext-reg/
>> 
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-epp-keyrelay/
>> 
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-obispo-epp-idn/
>> 
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tan-epp-launchphase/
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lozano-tmch-smd/
>> 
>> Does anyone object to adopting any one of these documents as a working group document?  If you, now is the time to speak up and tell us all why.
>> 
>> We'd like to suggest a relatively short time period for objections in this case.  We have all known about these documents for some time so it seems reasonable to just get started and see where the detailed reviews takes us.
>> 
>> If folks would please respond to the list by close of business everywhere Wednesday with either a "+1" to accept all documents or a message noting your objection that would be great!
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Jim and Antoin
>> _______________________________________________
>> EppExt mailing list
>> EppExt@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext