IETF Logo Mail Archive

[EToSat] Multicast tools and scenarios

"Morten V. Pedersen" <morten@steinwurf.com> Mon, 09 December 2019 10:28 UTC

Return-Path: <morten@steinwurf.com>
X-Original-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F02DF12003F for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 02:28:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8KnxyO1oj9rS for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 02:28:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk (mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk [46.183.139.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B41B120013 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 02:28:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout.gigahost.dk (mailout.gigahost.dk [89.186.169.112]) by mailout-taastrup.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6073A1891909 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:28:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gigahost.dk (smtp.gigahost.dk [89.186.169.109]) by mailout.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0887865A7 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:28:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.gigahost.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E105A27303CC; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:28:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Screener-Id: f8b5956341cafa01bc0fc2c7b7d4a245e1dff3de
Received: from [10.10.138.122] (unknown [77.243.63.160]) by smtp.gigahost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90B6927303B3 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:28:15 +0000 (UTC)
To: etosat@ietf.org
References: <BL0PR11MB33949C8A6A226271B7FF9FAF90420@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: "Morten V. Pedersen" <morten@steinwurf.com>
Message-ID: <1d376dae-0cd8-92e8-5b23-6da6ab41ca47@steinwurf.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 11:28:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR11MB33949C8A6A226271B7FF9FAF90420@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/etosat/vumBuoAgsZubXCGPRz1lAvXynkU>
Subject: [EToSat] Multicast tools and scenarios
X-BeenThere: etosat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The EToSat list is a non-WG mailing list used to discuss performance implications of running encrypted transports such as QUIC over satellite." <etosat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/etosat/>
List-Post: <mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:28:31 -0000

Dear all,

Following up on the "Download Regression Tests" thread. Which focuses on 
unicast (as far as I can tell). We are looking at multicast over 
satellite (in particular for file delivery). I'm not a satellite expert 
so I was wondering if similar parameters with respect to delay, 
data-rate etc. are valid there?

Also what (if any) would be the state-of-the art solution for that?

All the best,
Morten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email