Re: [Extra] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 23 September 2020 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AA93A0E14; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ilQ9chwwHBVL; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-f47.google.com (mail-ua1-f47.google.com [209.85.222.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F6E63A0E07; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-f47.google.com with SMTP id j12so6721505ual.7; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5PZ6ZzYZ7oj5RTF8hy8FMo+/JbatqGVcWpZ5dFkGPLc=; b=MxTL+pohMZ8mqrUDVY/yiV9wc0QIja5gQhWsPnX+9bOU6TTe7uzLnn6DegBtsUV5KE GtqUjgS46yZAcqVKyfrMc+TFueUTCGwYmj+xhxK9FGP92Th5DrkZWmR0xBrBKH6r5fed JekihacUac0J0NqzAgxhL6ErcJxbyFB8ELAzNdCj4sbUX2eMGuensOjRGaV0OxnCxDqV 5/tC3+OvvaMshsJmaUtlW7naLiZrOz4pzw49GqcOLKBhbLo6WrGaNfo00TDMPldMuAmG fV43Rwj87Jw699Whddbee8/jNdOJbHkx84eE0RbNgG4lP0ygM3AR4OAMx+G+8BOmezNr d6Mg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DrL5b3fvhNwm+g8WQDDG6UhYrKCnw8bVPT61crBJqcNfvg4Bj 5PLVCkfneqyLsSCjW6BND3Ksmdn3Vq8NVi8pOJU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyc3/zqzEBiOW1RsRvJXh1ShQG4M4ZTPRlb2acdCG3Lis3jYmExFVm8ckPVqMfoElabwsdIXoawGOtCbs6H0k4=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:60b1:: with SMTP id f17mr6737565uam.49.1600872586226; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 07:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160085317360.24429.9473480615397529741@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJLyzwOWYjdx_+y1QhEJ1KEVmuFDGnpPjXjiseB-An4wFg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLyzwOWYjdx_+y1QhEJ1KEVmuFDGnpPjXjiseB-An4wFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:49:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJHKipZB+StANn5k7gK=jTTb0THeRCoTgPKv+VyxX1REQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, extra@ietf.org, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, extra-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/QRSZ5LeSnlM7ibZ0dzuP3JWArMM>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:49:49 -0000

> >    This standardized display can reduce user confusion when using
> >    multiple clients, as abbreviated message representations in clients
> >    will show identical message contents.
> >
> > I didn't really find this reasoning to be compelling, and perhaps it could be
> > removed.  In my experience the amount of preview displayed depends on client
> > behaviour or settings (e.g., how much space to allow for previews).
>
> Perhaps some slight re-phrasing of this text will address your comment
> ℗rhaps changing the word "identical"), but the point here isn't that
> all clients will always present the preview in exactly the same way:
> indeed, one might present less text than another due to space
> limitations in the UI.  The point here is that if a message says that
> we have to discuss document status in the EXTRA working group and we
> should do it over lunch tomorrow and should we go for Chinese or
> Indian food and at what time... we won't wind up with one client's
> preview saying that the message is about the EXTRA working group's
> document status while another's says it's about lunch plans tomorrow
> and still another's that it's about China and India.  I think this is
> useful text making a useful point, and that we shouldn't remove it.

On thinking about re-phrasing, how does this sound?:

NEW
While different clients might generate quite different preview text,
having common preview text generated by the server can give a more
consistent user experience to those who use multiple clients.
END

Barry