Re: [Extra] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid-06: (with COMMENT)

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Tue, 31 July 2018 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3EF130DC2; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 06:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=ppHG5Sr7; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=S/lc8axG
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6QFTPyMjgAbu; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 06:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF744127148; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 06:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C31621AD2; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:29:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:29:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=gmspyA +D/YzQBPWVOc38szhRwukcchUvwpBgSH53flI=; b=ppHG5Sr7tOBwlapWIAvq3Z GsQj0jUeGxdMyDzhteGfaFsfzkfHWALfdB9ylm7quEYh/y9BKNY1TjwhRhu+f9T5 Gdn2zL1VE/bbBwpvH3+xi1TaYK/JvDP7HxrWd4SrFddIWCpeXv1hpdeNSL1cOvc9 w6fBYsyQz/qOCVzm+PjHP4S3rPDu9lzSuP9pz9AkpKH0Ru8PsmM10o2uNBnFcA3r YfjsPjnnu0zwp6bTty+59HNnjISVKY0yhidd41N9qUR6GWHfxM4T1rbWRemN8Tb0 crCokOEshBnTpCL8VtH0VzGacy925Uw/G/EAVri9T/H6te2gJY5IpvkBUlM1oAlw ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=gmspyA +D/YzQBPWVOc38szhRwukcchUvwpBgSH53flI=; b=S/lc8axGZvtdiWluBfvOa7 xMogE2HgbkJIlSbQlVbUNAEnSjOZvU7qxL7n34ppC+uPrzY3ZET9+Lha5dXZpOYm TMVADjoO4tf0mp/6xK5pS/jNX4GiJloj5UyBfcuddA3jc2p2BbQhUumFZJYmkx86 7VPvE+2lxL+vrQnDgAlrHuZNmLYCAKuZrSIRFnzTUZn3yzZ2EHI4YD7QFB5YqoKQ PAei9CetC9CYnP+S0VOhSBGSehgYPbOFj026Sacd7Rs5SteTmmavyJnNCb74Af9J iyKxExED9i92dgociJ9zife5sm6RsZ6ZXPb6VTPjtdM1HMfJwvnBdvU0E56WC/fg ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:G2RgW10_UXOa_ngmFx2gn4THuEfhoX4xE46x0-iTMtlSZutv8QsdOg> <xmx:G2RgW99llhDcvSxX0Fa5p3_EQNJvg_jr6HCh_g2Q3R0Zs3iFEkgvQA> <xmx:G2RgW_S_SNr_cPY6G2kPhixUg50BXnTKiQ4eTQ_PRNdm-75FGCZ0zw> <xmx:G2RgW8XK-6L2d7cQURnA1XMQP6w1LplLrWs9swmXmoqyYTOwVn3WYw> <xmx:G2RgW734D5liLpGdF4RZ_HJDe6IhtGIOupvDrOFey9AId-gLOedqtw> <xmx:HGRgW3oSgjiAJ9J4LtDGPkkKmp_ch6QwYMhAg5ORQGJtorQIljdNNg>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:G2RgW3b4CD-pWt1bMf7WpKT7pMrEbyUmPhkn3XvrQiI3Sc-Tir5IMw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id C2FC9621BF; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:28:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1533043739.2419021.1458678840.405F3734@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, extra@ietf.org, yaojk <yaojk@cnnic.cn>, draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid@ietf.org, extra-chairs@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_153304373924190211"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-0843ff3e
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJb2HBXO_G_QhO6TNy4FtZdaVxHFy2hNazhc7TFW4HwpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 23:28:59 +1000
References: <153296953086.765.16314337927744340162.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <f2c2b563-7190-e872-084a-1684eb34fbd0@isode.com> <CAHw9_iJb2HBXO_G_QhO6TNy4FtZdaVxHFy2hNazhc7TFW4HwpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/YBDkihLNVlstbVq_YzPnudE4-yM>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-objectid-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 13:29:03 -0000

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018, at 03:56, Warren Kumari wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 12:59 PM Alexey Melnikov
> <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Warren,
>> 
>> On 30/07/2018 17:52, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------>>> 
>>> Thank you for writing this - I'm really not an IMAP person, but the
>>> document>>> seems to me to be useful and clear.
>>> 
>>> I do have a question - this is either for my education or something
>>> that needs>>> fixing / clarification :-) Section 4.  MAILBOXID object identifier
>>> "The server>>> SHOULD NOT change MAILBOXID when renaming a folder, as this loses
>>> the main>>> benefit of having a unique identifier." All of the above things in
>>> this section>>> talk about keeping the MAILBOXID the same when doing things to the
>>> **mailbox**,>>> this one instead talks about **folder**; what is the difference
>>> between mailbox>>> and folder? I did spend some time looking and found: "IMAP4rev1
>>> permits>>> manipulation of mailboxes (remote message folders) in a way that is>>> functionally equivalent to local folders." (RFC3501) - this didn't
>>> enlighten me>>> much :-) Are the terms interchangeable here? If so, I'd suggest
>>> sticking with>>> one term. (Again, I'm not an IMAP person, this may all be obvious
>>> to those>>> schooled in the art )
>> Folder and mailbox mean the same thing.
> 
> Excellent, thank you - see, I learnt something :-)
> 
>> RFC 3501 was using "mailbox".
>> Users like to talk about "folders". I wish we can just make everybody>> use the same term, but that is not going to work ;-).
>> I agree that consistent terminology would be good.
> 
> Indeed.
> W

Thanks for your review.  I've removed folder and changed it to mailbox
since the objectid is called MAILBOXID so clearly mailbox is the
correct term :)
Cheers,

Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com