IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Wed, 23 September 2020 00:59 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3013A0905; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VU-URb1wlYAF; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D58F3A091B; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 08N0xJob022768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:59:22 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:59:19 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview@ietf.org, extra-chairs@ietf.org, extra@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200923005919.GU89563@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <160080490190.9778.18063295243922914906@ietfa.amsl.com> <772f45df-e259-4f54-9d39-cff148a82ff1@dogfood.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <772f45df-e259-4f54-9d39-cff148a82ff1@dogfood.fastmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/vZfbnl_u-EVFveUKh04flcfIJl0>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 00:59:30 -0000

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:55:29AM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020, at 06:01, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote:
> > I was a little surprised to not see any mention of the analogous JMAP
> > capability (but I guess I'm not actually sure whether one or the other
> > "came first").
> 
> It's already built into JMAP.  From RFC8621:

Exactly!  This is IMAP "catching up" to JMAP, at least in terms of
publication as an RFC.  If the JMAP feature was inspiration for the IMAP
feature, maybe that's worth remarking upon.

Thanks,

Ben

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email