[Fann] Re: Questions on agenda item 2 — draft-dong-fann-problem-statement

[Mike McBride <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

Yes, draft-dong-fann-problem-statement is the renamed
draft-ietf-rtgwg-net-notif-ps now moving under FANN per the charter. We are
waiting for it to be approved by all chairs. Hopefully it's approved today
now that the draft submission window has reopened.

It seems like it shouldn't need this step of going back to an individual
draft, and new adoption call, because it's the base document for the fann
wg. It should be submitted as draft-ietf-fann-problem-statement in my
opinion. What would happen if it wasn't adopted?

mike

On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 10:40 PM Zafar Ali (zali) <zali=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Pavan
>
> Yes, it is a move of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-net-notif-ps/ from
> RTGWG to FANN (to best of my knowledge):
>
>    - See also - "RTGWG has completed the incubation of FANN. Now that the
>    FANN WG is chartered, this PS document is moving to the FANN WG.” Under
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-net-notif-ps/history/
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards … Zafar
>
> *From: *Vishnu Pavan Beeram <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Saturday, July 18, 2026 at 4:20 PM
> *To: *[e-mail] <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *[Fann] Questions on agenda item 2 —
> draft-dong-fann-problem-statement
>
> Hi Chairs, WG,
>
> Apologies in advance for the basic questions — I'm new to the list and
> trying to get oriented before the session at IETF 126.
>
> Agenda item 2 [1] references "draft-dong-fann-problem-statement-00", but I
> wasn't able to find this document on the datatracker. Is this a
> renamed/resubmitted version of draft-ietf-rtgwg-net-notif-ps [2] under the
> new FANN WG naming, or is it a new document that hasn't been uploaded yet?
> The charter [3] does say the problem statement deliverable will use
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-net-notif-ps as a base, so I'm assuming they're related.
>
> Also, the charter describes a single deliverable for "problem statement,
> requirements, and gap analysis." Is there a plan to produce a single
> consolidated document covering all three, or will these be separate
> companion documents? The agenda item title ("problem statement,
> requirements and gap analysis") suggests they may be combined, but I wanted
> to confirm.
>
> Just trying to understand the document landscape before the meeting.
> Thanks in advance for any pointers.
>
> Best regards,
> Pavan
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-126-fann/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-net-notif-ps/
> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/fann/about/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fann mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>