Status of IP over FDDI
Kenneth Virgile <ken%signet.uucp@think.com> Thu, 20 December 1990 18:14 UTC
Received: from merit.edu by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09550; 20 Dec 90 13:14 EST
Received: Thu, 20 Dec 90 13:13:37 EST from Mail.Think.COM by merit.edu (5.59/1.6)
Return-Path: <ken%signet.uucp@Think.COM>
Received: from Think.COM by mail.think.com; Thu, 20 Dec 90 13:13:33 -0500
Received: from signet.UUCP by Early-Bird.Think.COM; Thu, 20 Dec 90 13:13:31 EST
Received: from leigh.signet.UUCP (sigma10) by signet.UUCP (4.0/SMI-4.0) id AA04768; Thu, 20 Dec 90 12:21:50 EST
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 1990 12:21:50 -0500
From: Kenneth Virgile <ken%signet.uucp@think.com>
Message-Id: <9012201721.AA04768@signet.UUCP>
To: FDDI@merit.edu
Subject: Status of IP over FDDI
Status: O
What's the status of "A Proposed Standard for the Transmission of IP Datagrams over FDDI Networks"? Does RFC 1042 have precedence? Since DEC encountered an Apple problem with the Protocol ID of 0-0-0, has a new proposed standard been published? Ken
- Status of IP over FDDI Kenneth Virgile
- Re: Status of IP over FDDI Dave Katz