Re: Suggested corrections to

James Reeves <> Mon, 16 November 1992 21:18 UTC

Received: from by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13087; 16 Nov 92 16:18 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13083; 16 Nov 92 16:18 EST
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04165; 16 Nov 92 16:20 EST
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA00684; Mon, 16 Nov 92 15:23:59 -0500
Received: from by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA00680; Mon, 16 Nov 92 15:23:56 -0500
Received: from by (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA07719; Mon, 16 Nov 92 12:22:35 PST
Message-Id: <>
Date: 16 Nov 92 12:32:44 U
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: James Reeves <>
Subject: Re: Suggested corrections to

         Reply to:   RE>Suggested corrections to FD

>>After reviewing the FDDI MIB Draft Version 2.1, we have the following
>>suggested corrections:

>>  Larry

I was busily typing out a list of issues with the MIB but it seems that DEC has
more than beat me to the punch. My compliments to Larry and all for such a
thorough review.

James Reeves