Re: Suggested corrections to
James Reeves <james_reeves@engtwomac.synoptics.com> Mon, 16 November 1992 21:18 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13087; 16 Nov 92 16:18 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13083; 16 Nov 92 16:18 EST
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04165; 16 Nov 92 16:20 EST
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA00684; Mon, 16 Nov 92 15:23:59 -0500
Received: from mvis1.synoptics.com by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA00680; Mon, 16 Nov 92 15:23:56 -0500
Received: from engtwomac.synoptics.com by synoptics.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA07719; Mon, 16 Nov 92 12:22:35 PST
Message-Id: <9211162022.AA07719@synoptics.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 12:32:44 -0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: James Reeves <james_reeves@engtwomac.synoptics.com>
Subject: Re: Suggested corrections to
To: fddi-mib@cs.utk.edu
Cc: stefani@quiver.enet.dec.com
Reply to: RE>Suggested corrections to FD >>After reviewing the FDDI MIB Draft Version 2.1, we have the following >>suggested corrections: >>Regards, >> Larry I was busily typing out a list of issues with the MIB but it seems that DEC has more than beat me to the punch. My compliments to Larry and all for such a thorough review. James Reeves SynOptics
- Re: Suggested corrections to James Reeves