Re: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Proto-team meeting in Jan

So, either

Feb 11-15

or

Jan 28-Feb1

Please reply all asap.

Thanks,
Greg

On Jan 17, 2008 1:36 PM, Ali Begen (abegen) <abegen@cisco.com> wrote:
> I guess my unavailable dates were caught up in the previous emails. I
> will be in Houston for the SMPTE/VSF conference from Sunday Feb 10th and
> Thursday Feb 14th. Under these circumstances, Friday 15th works for me.
>
> I also would like to re-iterate that Feb 15th. Is very close to the IETF
> deadlines. So, we won't have the chance for a follow-up meeting via
> teleconference, etc.
>
> It would be ideal if we could make it before the week starting Feb 4th.
>
> -acbegen
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Greg Shepherd [mailto:gjshep@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:46 AM
> > To: Marshall Eubanks
> > Cc: fecframe-proto@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Proto-team meeting in Jan
> >
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Okay EVERYONE.. ;-)
> >
> > It looks like the week of Feb 11th is best. The east-coasters
> > may prefer Tuesday the 12th to avoid flying on Sunday I'll
> > propose that first.
> >
> > Tuesday, Feb 12th, 9:00 AM PST
> > Cisco SJ Bldg 16
> >
> > I'll follow-up with a room number.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > On Jan 17, 2008 10:38 AM, Marshall Eubanks
> > <tme@multicasttech.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Mark Watson wrote:
> > >
> > > > February 4th to February 8th incl. are bad for me. Any
> > time in the
> > > > week beginning February 11th would be ideal.
> > > >
> > >
> > > And me as well (both the bad and good periods).
> > >
> > > Marshall
> > >
> > >
> > > > ...Mark
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 1/17/08 10:27 AM, "Greg Shepherd" <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Mark,
> > > >>
> > > >> Sorry, can  you please reply and use actual dates? Which
> > works for
> > > >> you the week of
> > > >>
> > > >> Feb 4th
> > > >> or
> > > >> Feb 11th
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Greg
> > > >>
> > > >> On Jan 8, 2008 10:29 AM, Mark Watson <mark@digitalfountain.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>> Last week in Jan/2nd Week in Feb are good for me.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ...Mark
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On 1/8/08 10:18 AM, "Greg Shepherd" <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> On Jan 8, 2008 10:09 AM, Mark Watson <mark@digitalfountain.com>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>> That week is ATIS IIF, and so not good for me.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> ...Mark
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Which week is bad? Which week is good?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Greg
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On 1/8/08 9:58 AM, "Greg Shepherd" <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Marshall,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Are you willing to be the talking head this time?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I'll be in SJ on Feb 4th for another meeting, so Feb 5th or
> > > >>>>>> later that week works for me.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> How does this work for the rest of you? We need to nail this
> > > >>>>>> down soon. Also, this is a proto-team meeting and not a WG
> > > >>>>>> interim meeting.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>> Greg
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Jan 2, 2008 1:17 PM, Marshall Eubanks
> > > >>>>>> <tme@multicasttech.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I have just learned that I probably will have to
> > be in Europe
> > > >>>>>>>> for February 4th and 5th.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> I should know for sure by tomorrow.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Yep, Helsinki,
> > > >>>>>>> Monday and Tuesday 4-5 February.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Where does this leave the interim ?
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Marshall
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Marshall
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Greg Shepherd wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> I spoke with a few of you after the WG meeting about the
> > > >>>>>>>>> next steps, and using two more interim meetings (or one
> > > >>>>>>>>> meeting and one
> > > >>>>>>>>> concall)
> > > >>>>>>>>> before Philly to keep us on task.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> The first/best week for me next year is the last
> > week of Jan
> > > >>>>>>>>> / first week of Feb. SJ worked well for most of
> > the group.
> > > >>>>>>>>> :) Or are there other suggestions of a host location?
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Please let me know what your Jan/Feb look like so we can
> > > >>>>>>>>> nail down a date before the year starts to fill up.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>>>>>>> Greg
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
> > > >>>>>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
> > > >>>>>>>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
> > > >>>>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
> > > >>>>>>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
> > > >>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
> > > >>>>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
> > FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto
> >
>

_______________________________________________
FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto