[forces] FEO events
Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com> Thu, 20 November 2014 14:31 UTC
Return-Path: <hadi@mojatatu.com>
X-Original-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: forces@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A281A1A04 for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:31:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fKnIIbh-Hp2v for <forces@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C97F31A1A1D for <forces@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id wn1so2295556obc.17 for <forces@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:31:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=ER6lZuer/zWKyeNEn3Vxk5Zg/rYGqW+YUXwSgwoU+gw=; b=W13WFmtQVn1F3dsNeZJMgVF8/Tk+V49UCLKFOtJuEpNAwpq/TZ2aR7tvfOP7z8Cp53 vkscFaVdIs5gS4GflWF0FSw6HXosxw2vPZI+hnVf0VF30TEO3hgCw+GGF1OHsMii9TZR xKVqbJz1+uYt3fnZzWCcTFwvxxv60fHZlyx6+bygMLIeJVmTKDC7y1c6wgrxajSz/1nQ vzM+EDHRlxuWx6zSUsQEUykdqIOlBM5tAmCax9VXjKHsey4v4YJglUoYalFS4drBTOYq PBXsvvxXYG6jOjHzBCdYr148bBaTwxGKF4/P/9uNs03huwFZGnNKW4zhUKyLQlpCBOvL ow7w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm9YB7nUkL2ujuac5349aERFfQEna8H/c1pREYrwX1EzVAei0nnHp+4Et7fEGA7h9bUG4mQ
X-Received: by 10.202.128.139 with SMTP id b133mr23952550oid.52.1416493895162; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:31:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.189.11 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 06:31:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 09:31:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAFAkD-nP40sjTy1HgZ=N+BjCmims3EckeQJ=9dG==rWfCrNvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: forces <forces@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="001a113ef44272c2a205084b2ff8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/forces/NO8v678nSt3abYsGQhH2ulA_Rsw
Subject: [forces] FEO events
X-BeenThere: forces@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: ForCES WG mailing list <forces.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/forces/>
List-Post: <mailto:forces@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces>, <mailto:forces-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:31:42 -0000
I have a use case for a control app needing to know when an LFB class instance is created or destroyed (without polling for changes). I have added (and currently coding) the attached patch to FEObject LFB. Is there any objection to this approach? It is becoming painful that i have to submit a draft every time we make such a small change. This generally speaks to the issue of "standards" and IETF in general than anything else. I will make another posting so this thread doesnt go on a tangent. cheers, jamal
- [forces] FEO events Jamal Hadi Salim