IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64-01.txt

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Mon, 11 July 2011 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F9521F88A0 for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vuwZLxp4WXAr for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAAB21F889F for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so4500673fxe.27 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bhz2ep5ndzW/+en10eraVjhp/RyHqPaYLOE3vKct6zo=; b=Idlwm2pq+FqJxUACqavLes8UyCpruYar6fwiullA5LKmWkZiP9aA/Vm9QuNe43lCmR DslXBX3oGWwRVv71OEhuubZJnCYi1ODNIzrmWMhnIU7cBrGCto9ViGawxv+NVyMEWEx3 XN8qmNcbY4Tx+76Ng3ipxp3+s0oAlT+BGB1lc=
Received: by 10.223.13.211 with SMTP id d19mr6848352faa.67.1310356101807; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h26sm916239faj.35.2011.07.10.20.48.19 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 10 Jul 2011 20:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E1A72B2.3030202@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 06:49:06 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ftpext@ietf.org
References: <20110711021824.28949.30520.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <307F6EAD43104B7DB589F155@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <307F6EAD43104B7DB589F155@PST.JCK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 03:48:23 -0000

11.07.2011 5:58, John C Klensin wrote:
>>     The File transfer protocol, which is defined by the RFC
>> 959, has a long history, but still being widely used.  The
>> original version of FTP specification defines IPv4 version
>> of FTP.
> This is obviously not a big deal --I'll have more real comments
> on the draft later-- but the above statement from the abstract
> is unquestionably false.
+1
>
> The original version of the FTP specification was published in
> April 1971 in RFC 114, long before IPv4 was even imagined.  It
> defined the NCP version of FTP for the ARPANET.
Actually this is true.  The first document which specified FTP as we 
currently know it was RFC 354, though.  But the concept was set in RFC 114.

Mykyta
>
>    -- john
>      (Aka cranky old guy who was somewhat involved in the
> original design and who has been using FTP since 1971)
>
> _______________________________________________
> ftpext mailing list
> ftpext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email