Re: [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64-01.txt
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 11 July 2011 02:58 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3820B21F8650 for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4kKAt09FQJBP for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C53C21F8605 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 19:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Qg6hP-000HBP-3Y for ftpext@ietf.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:58:19 -0400
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:58:18 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: ftpext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <307F6EAD43104B7DB589F155@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <20110711021824.28949.30520.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20110711021824.28949.30520.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 02:58:20 -0000
> The File transfer protocol, which is defined by the RFC
> 959, has a long history, but still being widely used. The
> original version of FTP specification defines IPv4 version
> of FTP.
This is obviously not a big deal --I'll have more real comments
on the draft later-- but the above statement from the abstract
is unquestionably false.
The original version of the FTP specification was published in
April 1971 in RFC 114, long before IPv4 was even imagined. It
defined the NCP version of FTP for the ARPANET.
-- john
(Aka cranky old guy who was somewhat involved in the
original design and who has been using FTP since 1971)
- [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64-01.… internet-drafts
- Re: [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64… John C Klensin
- Re: [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [ftpext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ftpext2-ftp64… liu dapeng