Re: [ftpext] Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-10.txt> (An FTP ALG for IPv6-to-IPv4 translation) to Proposed Standard

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Mon, 27 June 2011 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC54611E80E4 for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.619
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3=1.63]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5NGFfo49DrOs for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (www.haxx.se [IPv6:2a00:1a28:1200:9::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BC811E80E3 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-2) with ESMTP id p5RDxTwH024895; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:59:29 +0200
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:59:29 +0200
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <0EFB0822-247B-4B8A-818F-1E09EC90B07B@muada.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106271557350.6453@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <20110520224813.2156.61466.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F40CA232-5C1B-4632-8F4C-5AD6C156903C@muada.com> <0EFB0822-247B-4B8A-818F-1E09EC90B07B@muada.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Greylist: Default is to whitelist mail, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.8 (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:59:29 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: ftpext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ftpext] Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-10.txt> (An FTP ALG for IPv6-to-IPv4 translation) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 13:59:38 -0000

On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

>> The document does not mention or discuss LPRT and LPSV. Is that intentional?
>
> I have to admit that I was unaware of RFC 1639, and to my knowledge there 
> are no (surviving) implementations. Or does anyone know of any?

curl used to support LPRT and family out of some idea of correctness but since 
we basically never saw a server support them and EPRT/EPSV were supported we 
removed support of the RFC 1639 commands again already back in January 2006...

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se