IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ftpext] Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-10.txt> (An FTP ALG for IPv6-to-IPv4 translation) to Proposed Standard

"William F. Maton" <wmaton@ottix.net> Mon, 27 June 2011 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <wmaton@ottix.net>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BCC21F85CF for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.969
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_PROLOSTOCK_SYM3=1.63]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JVV+2b2M2dac for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iskra.ottix.net (iskra.ottix.net [192.231.228.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40EA21F85A7 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 07:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from iskra.ottix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iskra.ottix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5RED3Pk023808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:13:03 -0400
Received: from localhost (wmaton@localhost) by iskra.ottix.net (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id p5RED35F023805; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:13:03 -0400
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:13:03 -0400
From: "William F. Maton" <wmaton@ottix.net>
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106271557350.6453@tvnag.unkk.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1106271011290.9575@iskra.ottix.net>
References: <20110520224813.2156.61466.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F40CA232-5C1B-4632-8F4C-5AD6C156903C@muada.com> <0EFB0822-247B-4B8A-818F-1E09EC90B07B@muada.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106271557350.6453@tvnag.unkk.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: ftpext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ftpext] Fwd: [BEHAVE] Last Call: <draft-ietf-behave-ftp64-10.txt> (An FTP ALG for IPv6-to-IPv4 translation) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:13:29 -0000

On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Daniel Stenberg wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
>>> The document does not mention or discuss LPRT and LPSV. Is that 
>>> intentional?
>> 
>> I have to admit that I was unaware of RFC 1639, and to my knowledge there 
>> are no (surviving) implementations. Or does anyone know of any?
>
> curl used to support LPRT and family out of some idea of correctness but 
> since we basically never saw a server support them and EPRT/EPSV were 
> supported we removed support of the RFC 1639 commands again already back in 
> January 2006...

These are still supported for wu-ftpd, but like curl, EPRT/EPSV are 
favoured for a long time now.

wfms

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email