Re: [ftpext] Discouraging use of TCP "urgent data"

Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se> Wed, 22 September 2010 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <daniel@haxx.se>
X-Original-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E3F3A6A82 for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.449, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YpYEY69ZOu0g for <ftpext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2343A685B for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from giant.haxx.se (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]) by giant.haxx.se (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1) with ESMTP id o8MHfYDG016405; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:41:34 +0200
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:41:33 +0200
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
X-X-Sender: dast@giant.haxx.se
To: "William F. Maton" <wmaton@ottix.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009221321420.30261@iskra.ottix.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1009221940350.9626@tvnag.unkk.fr>
References: <4C98B731.2030802@isode.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009211253500.29844@iskra.ottix.net> <4C9A056C.9010808@gont.com.ar> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1009221321420.30261@iskra.ottix.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
X-fromdanielhimself: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Greylist: Default is to whitelist mail, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.5 (giant.haxx.se [80.67.6.50]); Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:41:34 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, ftpext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ftpext] Discouraging use of TCP "urgent data"
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:41:13 -0000

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, William F. Maton wrote:

>> Please note that Cisco Pix (and probably others) clear the URG bit by 
>> default.... so be prepared for the urgent indications to be unreliable...
>
> So just to think out loud, I'm wondering now if the FTP client should no 
> longer depend on ABOR actually working....

Why? Surely most commands already work fine without URG so why does ABOR 
depend so hard on it?

-- 

  / daniel.haxx.se