IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ftpext] draft-ietf-ftpext2-typeu-00

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Mon, 30 May 2011 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5647CE07B6 for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q3VBMwr3G4G4 for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5EEE072F for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1306775105; x=1338311105; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4DE3CE3F.5000503@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20Mo n,=2030=20May=202011=2012:05:03=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Re snick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20John=20C=20Klensin=20<john-iet f@jck.com>|CC:=20<ftpext@ietf.org>|Subject:=20Re:=20[ftpe xt]=20draft-ietf-ftpext2-typeu-00|References:=20<70AD2F64 6D39D0733A704390@PST.JCK.COM>|In-Reply-To:=20<70AD2F646D3 9D0733A704390@PST.JCK.COM>|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B =20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1"=3B=20format=3Dflowed |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|X-Originating-IP:=20[1 72.30.48.1]; bh=FO23sM+VUH2mf08HLNkDtHimdPHb578B3rh942og0cQ=; b=vq7LutrwW0H++sHCRyQG+kgLn+5QmTvp5EjwS5/SGymB3Lr3ZfGYiKdK 7hUy5Nm7g6L1xFXFnOWQcPUuJpNdsd7L8qx9229xMV5dOptsvqv4Bvn3i N5xh96dhvzaSIVQ9o0W96/zjuxy2/1leJ0EEldTTh02P10wu0LLv547qk o=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6362"; a="94306244"
Received: from ironmsg03-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.17]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 30 May 2011 10:05:05 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,291,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="76078995"
Received: from nasanexhc05.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.2]) by Ironmsg03-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 30 May 2011 10:05:05 -0700
Received: from Macintosh-4.local (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 30 May 2011 10:05:04 -0700
Message-ID: <4DE3CE3F.5000503@qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 12:05:03 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
References: <70AD2F646D39D0733A704390@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <70AD2F646D39D0733A704390@PST.JCK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Cc: ftpext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ftpext] draft-ietf-ftpext2-typeu-00
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 17:05:07 -0000

Silence from the mailing list for a week is not a good thing. Chairs, 
what's up with this?

pr

On 5/23/11 1:50 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I just got a note indicating that this draft is about to expire.
> It was accepted as a WG work item, originally with a "Submit
> 'FTP Extension for Internationalized Text' as working group
> item" date last April and a target of WG Last Call of July.
>
> (1) Does the WG intend to take it up?
>
> (2) If no discussion is needed, when should a WG Last Call be
> initiated?
>
> (3) I'm ok with submitting a -01 just to keep it active but, if
> anyone has anything substantive that they'd like to see changed
> in the draft, now would be a good time to post those comments.
>
>      john
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ftpext mailing list
> ftpext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext
>    


-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email