[ftpext] draft-ietf-ftpext2-typeu-00
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 23 May 2011 18:50 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB4CE07EB for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2011 11:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.487
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.487 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.112, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x9GYxGQRvZs5 for <ftpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2011 11:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F593E07E6 for <ftpext@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2011 11:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1QOaD8-000B7f-Ju for ftpext@ietf.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 14:50:38 -0400
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 14:50:37 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: ftpext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <70AD2F646D39D0733A704390@PST.JCK.COM>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [ftpext] draft-ietf-ftpext2-typeu-00
X-BeenThere: ftpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ftpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ftpext>
List-Post: <mailto:ftpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ftpext>, <mailto:ftpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 18:50:40 -0000
Hi.
I just got a note indicating that this draft is about to expire.
It was accepted as a WG work item, originally with a "Submit
'FTP Extension for Internationalized Text' as working group
item" date last April and a target of WG Last Call of July.
(1) Does the WG intend to take it up?
(2) If no discussion is needed, when should a WG Last Call be
initiated?
(3) I'm ok with submitting a -01 just to keep it active but, if
anyone has anything substantive that they'd like to see changed
in the draft, now would be a good time to post those comments.
john
- [ftpext] draft-ietf-ftpext2-typeu-00 John C Klensin
- Re: [ftpext] draft-ietf-ftpext2-typeu-00 Pete Resnick