IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Fud] Revised Charter Text

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 27 September 2017 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: fud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8915D1350D9 for <fud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CeSQRPFUb0rs for <fud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 233601350D3 for <fud@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA8430058D for <fud@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:17:17 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 55_A-t3E-Avh for <fud@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:17:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.20.1.237] (h60.74.129.40.static.ip.windstream.net [40.129.74.60]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 244893002A3; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:17:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <FAC5CB2C-2BCB-400D-8432-1A9C5B9A2072@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_169ABCC2-F08E-41A9-96FE-9DFDCFBA2516"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:17:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <B7D00C27-E186-4455-AEE4-02066F5D430F@tzi.org>
Cc: fud@ietf.org
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <598d9373-4a4a-01c3-33e8-34ed1beceaa2@gmx.net> <B7D00C27-E186-4455-AEE4-02066F5D430F@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/fud/DrJBeYLRNtMIXhoY-jLzMmBBgWo>
Subject: Re: [Fud] Revised Charter Text
X-BeenThere: fud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: FUD - Firmware Updating Description <fud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fud>, <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/fud/>
List-Post: <mailto:fud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fud>, <mailto:fud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:17:19 -0000

>> Firmware Updating Description (FUD)
>> [Alternative proposal: SUIT (Software Updates for Internet of Things).]
> 
> SUIT is so much better than FUD.
> 
> (When we created the DICE working group, which was about “Improvements to DTLS for the Internet of Things”, we got some strong feedback that people weren’t going to install “IDIOT” modifications into their systems.
> I think the same applies for “FUD”.  And the suits will quickly agree with installing SUIT :-))

I am chairing two groups where the WG got a different name than the BoF.  In both cases, the mail list continues to have the BoF name, and it causes confusion.  If the WG gets called something other than FUD, I strongly recommend closing this mail list and opening one that is named the same as the WG.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email