IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [fun] New Non-WG Mailing List: fun -- FUture home Networking (FUN)

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 07 June 2011 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B1D21F84CE for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.354
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.354 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.245, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m61keIZoG3ne for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A9621F84FB for <fun@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA612CC4B; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:26:00 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UApNga-iv9Nh; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:26:00 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B5A2CC3B; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 18:26:00 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <4DEE4307.3070706@piuha.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:25:59 +0300
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
References: <20110606165456.74F4411E8179@ietfa.amsl.com> <20110606204755.GA32176@nic.fr> <6F2D64905D13DA87C2343EB7@PST.JCK.COM> <4DEDB0BC.7040906@piuha.net> <20110607071602.GA4725@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20110607071602.GA4725@nic.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: fun@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [fun] New Non-WG Mailing List: fun -- FUture home Networking (FUN)
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:26:04 -0000

Stephane,

>> For name resolution and service discovery, extensions are needed to
>> mDNS and DNS-SD to enable them to work across subnets.
>>     
>
> There is currently one RFC about, how to call it, "local name
> resolution", it is RFC 4795. Why mentioning only the other proposal?
>   

I think this is a bug in the charter. It should really cover both.

But I'm not the local name resolution expert. What do others think?

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email