Re: [fun] New Non-WG Mailing List: fun -- FUture home Networking (FUN)

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Tue, 07 June 2011 07:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fun@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B5611E80B7 for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fquzn9qSBOP9 for <fun@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3003:2::4:11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8DD11E80C1 for <fun@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 00:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 526721C00E4; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0A81C00D5; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.6.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CBC7B0037; Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:16:02 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Message-ID: <20110607071602.GA4725@nic.fr>
References: <20110606165456.74F4411E8179@ietfa.amsl.com> <20110606204755.GA32176@nic.fr> <6F2D64905D13DA87C2343EB7@PST.JCK.COM> <4DEDB0BC.7040906@piuha.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DEDB0BC.7040906@piuha.net>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.1
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: fun@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [fun] New Non-WG Mailing List: fun -- FUture home Networking (FUN)
X-BeenThere: fun@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "FUture home Networking \(FUN\)" <fun.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fun>
List-Post: <mailto:fun@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fun>, <mailto:fun-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 07:16:07 -0000

On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 08:01:48AM +0300,
 Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote 
 a message of 164 lines which said:

> For name resolution and service discovery, extensions are needed to
> mDNS and DNS-SD to enable them to work across subnets.

There is currently one RFC about, how to call it, "local name
resolution", it is RFC 4795. Why mentioning only the other proposal?