IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [gaia] draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments. Mitar review, question #4. Classification

Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com> Wed, 13 April 2016 10:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mmitar@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B71612D18A for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 03:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3nD-kpSNxDvq for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 03:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x241.google.com (mail-ig0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44BC612D11A for <gaia@irtf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 03:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x241.google.com with SMTP id qu10so5930350igc.1 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 03:24:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=ghTfiuGlEiVh52R5nyfMADVLKPUszkvcLK5auszsP0U=; b=AR/DGH9usdUWPp1i5XsaFqg4X1TLQ53Uf6AXDpl784E7toWYORFbCwZp+l+OnvJTSv 0+zj4I/SGIxyl2Uf8Aa4pvLh4kCFypYmWeRfx7vOGGRF/qYgGVV8o+hvtACog+LfvyT7 JgaI7P0qVgn3yTWPrth0VvXAxideg9dZIggzNCrv62XLSXKpRib2Qz/Y5e5Xdq/cA9du mu3ycnBRAk37s30WSXzbSgRxmLtrLqRjLuuka9LdqkIpWKCjtMkwzo6Nxj/CrQanNDgr vG35synzUwIIYi+mLSoiEMendEdbf6GGQX3dP4MVh9CwZTiMlyfzLEv9pfXpsf5PWtu1 cZAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=ghTfiuGlEiVh52R5nyfMADVLKPUszkvcLK5auszsP0U=; b=ad8t4t39A2USD6MMARYEzYTOOxRmTaVlquCYFQ3DpW+oUnHJVoG4jtGVN7AGiPHQ7n /OUgRFsOtIxWvQ9UOusQ3Lb8XOo72RuyqF+cbkps15/WJJNtV6AhIFyft9TGh8Wkqj/t mH8lG46pfZWrztnj+fEwpxMqfUrwhdb8CRkUjaplNwAUs1eNJ447CJ1OHzUsPOl23TEk la+XGIQvAOYzBOe5u7YPxgm7RNhI4eOLw5vrIdxaz2G5+d10E5g81+vCiuclaUN6t4TB 4eNmVr+WeZvKLACL7efeSSi7L4hUlv+0HxMXkh2JOoPDuw9KfkepEVPvurfCxMk7kOBT M3eQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FV8qjZj0/US2kvTrg7X0OXkpdWt0jwcxoAML2r/mvXV+hHpo+uxZ4spZ0oWGdJP2wq3yrAtWiMut+HCUw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.92.41 with SMTP id cj9mr9490430igb.38.1460543078516; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 03:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.13.76 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 03:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <005c01d194c6$ad5c5540$0814ffc0$@unizar.es>
References: <005c01d194c6$ad5c5540$0814ffc0$@unizar.es>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 03:24:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKLmikPMem_N3hZ-538x1x53wptaSUkbXvsHEnS3_hD5m9G74A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>
To: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/zxuQduluS2eMKT12n5FP8zdhN28>
Cc: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [gaia] draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments. Mitar review, question #4. Classification
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:24:41 -0000

Hi!

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote:
> We tried to find some "orthogonal" axes (see
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gaia/current/msg00640.html) and we
> arrived to these:
>
> 4.1.  Commercial model / promoter
> 4.2.  Goals and motivation
> 4.3.  Administrative model
> 4.4.  Technologies employed
> 4.5.  Typical scenarios
>
> They may not be "orthogonal", and not every combination of the criteria does
> make sense, but I think they are useful for classifying the networks.

I would then suggest to add "ownership of equipment" or just
"ownership" to one of these dimensions.

If we extend also goals and motivation with additional options, then I
think this is closer to be able to cover community networks.

> The list of motivations has been expanded as you suggested.

Then we should probably add them as used by community networks.

>> Technologies used: TDMA should be there, Ubiquiti gear does it by default.
>
> Can you provide a reference? Thanks!

Ubiquiti calls this technology airMax:

https://www.ubnt.com/broadband/
https://dl.ubnt.com/AirMax_ppt.pdf

It is their proprietary WiFi extension. There is also an open source
project aiming to provide this as well:

https://wiki.freebsd.org/WifiTDMA


Mitar

-- 
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email